SenSk9tSen said:Cause he is 21, not experienced, and Spezza and Staal almost already have as much points as Nash did last season.
Compare Nash's 51 to 3...sec17 said:Assuming you mean 2003-04... and comparing the new NHL to the old is comparing apples to oranges.
Oil3rs said:Compare Nash's 51 to 3...
Den said:The question should be rather, why the guy who played 6 games only this season is on the team?
Captain Canuck 19 said:Because he's got size, skill, game-breaking abilities, and proven chemistry with other members of the team. So regardless of his injury riddled season the intangibles he brings to the table are too hard to pass up.
Excellent point.Den said:The question should be rather, why the guy who played 6 games only this season is on the team?
Den said:Then I have a better candidate: big E after his next concussion.
Lindros_for_rizzle_ said:Hey! Don´t even joke about it. A sentence like that don´t have any reason in the **** world to be on a forum like this. Start behaving.
jacketracket said:Excellent point.
If they were going to take a young kid, they should have taken that one kid who dominated the Worlds, for Canada ...
SoCalSharkzFan said:Only playing 6 games this season, and only having 3 points.... Worst pick by Team Canada by far. Could there be any lesser deserving pick imaginable?
Hmmmm ... does that kid's team even get that far, without that kid?CSKA said:Hmmmm that kid who did absolutly nothing in the semis and the final game ? That kid ?
If it was Ovechkin, would you push him aside?Den said:The question should be rather, why the guy who played 6 games only this season is on the team?
I don't get it, why bring up Big E? Lindros is nowhere near the level he used to be. Nash is younger, better and has proven that he can dominate.Den said:Then I have a better candidate: big E after his next concussion.
That kid along with Thornton and Gagné, was hands down Canada's best line. In case you forgot, hockey is a team sport and Team Canada was not a very good team at the last WCh, at least IMO. Heatley didn't do much either so are you suggesting that we forget him too? What some of you Russians don't get is that Canada wouldn't have gotten that far without Nash. It's that simple.CSKA said:Hmmmm that kid who did absolutly nothing in the semis and the final game ? That kid ?
I disagree.ferns8916 said:Nash isn't the player Kariya is. Nor is he the player that Shanahan or Tanguay are.
Canuck21t said:If it was Ovechkin, would you push him aside?