SmackDown's ratings didn't increase because they went live
They increased because they created a real brand split and returned a main title back on SD television and reorganized the entire show's format to not be a continuation of Raw's storylines.
I think the 300k instantly is because it went live and then the increases in the almost 2 years since are due to the product itself.I dont think there's any way you can prove that tbh. In theory you could do everything you listed but if it's taped do people care?
They're putting it on Friday? I missed that one.Because airing it live on Friday's would involve WWE changing the way they've scheduled things for nearly 20 years now...
Yeah, they did that already.Imagine a heel Rusev vs. face Reigns feud.
Rusev lays a savage beating on the beloved babyface superstar Roman Reigns as Cole recoils at the horror of the situation despite the fact that the crowd is going nuts for Rusev.
For a billion dollars, I can’t see them not compromising. That would be a ridiculous price for a taped show.Because airing it live on Friday's would involve WWE changing the way they've scheduled things for nearly 20 years now...
SmackDown's ratings didn't increase because they went live
They increased because they created a real brand split and returned a main title back on SD television and reorganized the entire show's format to not be a continuation of Raw's storylines.
The TV's from England aren't huge drop-offsYeah...
... No.
WWE's European Tour shows have historically lower ratings than live shows. Or do they just randomly do a brand split for those weeks only?
And if having a title mattered, RAW's ratings would be below SD's for the last year.
The TV's from England aren't huge drop-offs
Raw did better ratings last week (~2%) and Smackdown stayed the same.Huge no, less yes. Nobody's saying they're gonna lose half their audience.
The bottom line is that it doesn't matter. They should cut down on the house shows now anywaysWhat's the big deal with Smackdown touring changing from Saturday - Tuesday to Friday - Monday to facilitate it being live? Gets everyone in the company on the same schedule in terms of days and it should help Smackdown draw better in terms of attendance as people are much more likely to go on a Friday night to a show than a Tuesday night.
The bottom line is that it doesn't matter. They should cut down on the house shows now anyways
The towns they run, that doesn't matter either. The people who go to a show in Saskatoon or Allentown are going to go. No one is a big enough star other than Lesnar or Cena to draw at house shows like thatWhat about Raw/SD house shows combined that way wrestlers don't have to go every single night? They can sell more tickets with a bigger roster and some guys can get nights off. Maybe? Maybe not?
The bottom line is that it doesn't matter. They should cut down on the house shows now anyways
It's weird seeing negative reaction to such great news for the WWE and wrestling altogether. In a period where it really felt like wrestling was moving more and more to niche, out pops NJPW who has been delivering for years but now getting viewed by more casual wrestling fans. Then comes some great Indy news like the All In show. And now we have the big guns getting a **** load of money and that puts a lot of wrestlers in position to make good money for a long time. Good for them.
Honestly I think the last couple weeks have been nothing but awesome for wrestling. Interested to see where it all goes. Of course we have some general concerns on storylines/content/etc, but this is great stuff.
What's the big deal with Smackdown touring changing from Saturday - Tuesday to Friday - Monday to facilitate it being live? Gets everyone in the company on the same schedule in terms of days and it should help Smackdown draw better in terms of attendance as people are much more likely to go on a Friday night to a show than a Tuesday night.
Raw did better ratings last week (~2%) and Smackdown stayed the same.
I wonder if they completely re-brand Smackdown altogether and give it a new name. One of my big questions
Also, someone said that this means they don't have to have good shows. That depends. They have to gain new viewers. Fox isn't going go for basically ~$1M per viewer per year without then moving it to FS1. They will go up when it happens, and when they do they need a product that keeps those people. The 2.5-2.7 is basically their floor right now.
It's also when Disney is launching their own streaming service, isn't it?October 2019 makes sense since according to Kevin Feige (head of Marvel Studios), that's when the Disney/Fox deal will probably be finalized.
isn't the Disney/Fox deal just for 21st Century Fox? So just the film division.
isn't the Disney/Fox deal just for 21st Century Fox? So just the film division.
Assets to be acquired by Disney[edit]
Included in the deal are the majority of 21st Century Fox's entertainment, international and regional sports assets.[1] These include:
- Fox Entertainment Group
- FX Networks[18]
- National Geographic Partners (73%)[71]
- Star TV[71]
- Hulu (United States) (30% -- Disney already owns 30%, after which it will own 60%)[18]
- Sky plc (39.14%)[74][1]
- Endemol Shine Group (50%)