Confirmed with Link: Mike Condon (PIT) to the Senators for 5th round pick

Shanny

Let's Win It All
Jun 12, 2009
7,723
10
Bytown
Not against having an experienced backup, but didn't the Habs put this guy on waivers a month ago?...seems like poor asset management regardless of how low of a pick we gave up.
 

Tuna99

Registered User
Sep 26, 2009
14,974
7,014
Condon for a conditional pick.

Was on waivers, but we weren't in need a of tendy at the time.

Good move. He's a better goalie then Hammond IMO. Will probably be the full time backup if Ottawa can find a spot for the Hamburglar.
 

YouGotAStuGoing

Registered User
Mar 26, 2010
19,355
4,932
Ottawa, Ontario
Not against having an experienced backup, but didn't the Habs put this guy on waivers a month ago?...seems like poor asset management regardless of how low of a pick we gave up.

Picking him up now but not then suggests to me that Hammond's injury may be more serious than first thought. Or we just want to give Anderson the latitude to come and go as he needs to. No problem with the asset management given circumstances.
 

BondraTime

Registered User
Nov 20, 2005
28,740
23,486
East Coast
Not against having an experienced backup, but didn't the Habs put this guy on waivers a month ago?...seems like poor asset management regardless of how low of a pick we gave up.

We didn't need a goalie when he was placed on waivers.
 

Indrew

Registered User
Feb 6, 2007
11,370
10
Not against having an experienced backup, but didn't the Habs put this guy on waivers a month ago?...seems like poor asset management regardless of how low of a pick we gave up.

The obvious answer here is that they didn't need him on October 11th, but they do now.
 

topshelf15

Registered User
May 5, 2009
27,993
6,005
Hammond has proven to be unreliable,getting Condon is a very solid move for us ,Hammy on waivers as soon as he is healthy :nod:
 

Sens of Anarchy

Registered User
Jul 9, 2013
65,527
50,249
Picking him up now but not then suggests to me that Hammond's injury may be more serious than first thought. Or we just want to give Anderson the latitude to come and go as he needs to. No problem with the asset management given circumstances.

Groin injury from what I heard. Rehab could take a while.
 

topshelf15

Registered User
May 5, 2009
27,993
6,005
Yes hindsight changes everything, but still...why give up a 5th rounder on a guy that will likely place at most 15-20 games for us this season?
Really?? we had a need .Besides a 5th rounder isnt likely to be much of anything ,even if he does become a player it will likely be 5 years down the road
 

Super Cake

Registered User
Jun 24, 2013
31,030
6,474
Yes hindsight changes everything, but still...why give up a 5th rounder on a guy that will likely place at most 15-20 games for us this season?

Because Hammond may be more injured than we think and it is a question mark on how long Anderson will actually be with the team.

Do you really want to rely on a goaltending tandem of Dreidger-O'Conner?
 

Tuna99

Registered User
Sep 26, 2009
14,974
7,014
Hammond has proven to be unreliable,getting Condon is a very solid move for us ,Hammy on waivers as soon as he is healthy :nod:

Great asset Management by Pitt. Good on Dorion for picking up a legit Goalie to help us get wins. He is serious about winning, sometimes these soft trades turn out to be really important
 

Shanny

Let's Win It All
Jun 12, 2009
7,723
10
Bytown
Really?? we had a need .Besides a 5th rounder isnt likely to be much of anything ,even if he does become a player it will likely be 5 years down the road

Pittsburgh had a need as well given that Matt Murray was returning very soon, Condon likely would've been placed on waivers again if Rutherford couldn't find a team desperate enough to give something up for him.
 

slamigo

Skate or Die!
Dec 25, 2007
6,437
3,824
Ottawa
Yes hindsight changes everything, but still...why give up a 5th rounder on a guy that will likely place at most 15-20 games for us this season?

Because those 15-20 games could mean the difference between playoffs or not.

It's just a responsible move. Andy could have to leave the team for unknown amounts of time and I don't think it would be prudent to rely solely on Hammond, Dreidger and O'Connor.
 

topshelf15

Registered User
May 5, 2009
27,993
6,005
Great asset Management by Pitt. Good on Dorion for picking up a legit Goalie to help us get wins. He is serious about winning, sometimes these soft trades turn out to be really important
Yep,nothing wrong with this move at all
 

BondraTime

Registered User
Nov 20, 2005
28,740
23,486
East Coast
Pittsburgh had a need as well given that Matt Murray was returning very soon, Condon likely would've been placed on waivers again if Rutherford couldn't find a team desperate enough to give something up for him.

Rutherford had come out and said he wouldn't be placing him on waivers
 

Tuna99

Registered User
Sep 26, 2009
14,974
7,014
Yes hindsight changes everything, but still...why give up a 5th rounder on a guy that will likely place at most 15-20 games for us this season?

Murray made a really bad asset management trade for a goon that was put on waivers like 3 times and a few days after he cleared waivers Murray traded a pick to get him. He was totally useless. Patty W got his face punched up and it seemed like a reactionary move by Murray.
This trade is about winning now. That goon didn't do squat for us, Condon is a legit talent
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad