So why do the Jets do it? As strong case for wild. Don’t see case for Jets.
Value of: Mark Scheifele
- Thread starter FlappyGiraffe
- Start date
They easily get more then that embarrassing offer you just made.
Tasteless Beaver
Here for the hot takes
What's stopping Chevy to reach out to Klingberg's agent to gauge what a contract might look like and have an agreement in place before the UFA period. He can trade for his rights or better yet Dallas can sign him for the extra year to bring costs down.
And you're suggesting Winnipeg trade Scheifele to Dallas to get that extra year? Seriously? Did you really think that through and decide "hey that makes sense."
Wallet Inspector
Registered User
- Jan 19, 2013
- 5,839
- 5,096
If the Jets don't want a rebuild type of return, getting Fiala gives them an immediate high end forward to replace Schiefele.
Eggtimer
Registered User
So the Jets should take a package of shit and make themselves way worse for the next decade to make you happy with a terrible trade offer . Gotcha .
I am Canadian
AM34|WN88|MM16
gojetsgo
Registered User
- Nov 1, 2015
- 9,975
- 28,000
so you follow up a terrible trade proposal with another terrible trade proposal...
I thought it might get your attention
How about making a proposal of your own then instead of crapping on other posters ?
gojetsgo
Registered User
- Nov 1, 2015
- 9,975
- 28,000
no one crapped on your offer, you just got overly upset that people told you no...
Who crapped on you?
YOU offered DeBrusk, Grzelcyk, first, Steen (no to Lysell, Lohrei, Swayman) in response to a post claiming the ask is "a1st line winger, a 1st /2d pair D, a first and a decent winger prospect"
DeBrusk is not a 1st line winger - apparently you disagree?
Grezlcyk does not fill a need (Jets have Morrissey, Dillon, Samberg, Stanley and Heinola all on the LHS). So, not a knock on Grezlcyk but not a fit. The Jets DO need a 1st pair / 2nd pair RHD though.
The first is a first
Steen is a decent winger prospect, I guess, but basically an unnecessary throw in
And I DID respond to your post, saying switch Grezlcyk with Carlo, who would be the main piece in the trade.
I'm more inclined to think Carlo could be involved than before we got Lindholm.
Carlo...first..
No lysell from our end
What other pieces...debrusk ?
Not much value now but studnicka ?
Extra pick ?
Thechozen1
Registered User
- Sep 8, 2021
- 2,390
- 3,327
A team like Carolina could easily outbid your offer and continue to own the bruins like they’re doing right now. Enjoy getting thumped in these and future playoffs.
WhereAreTheCookies
Registered User
Curious what Jets fans would consider a proper offer from someone like Carolina. Not saying that the Bruins offer was reasonable, but more as a basis of comparison.
I would consider Carlo, DeBrusk and the 1st a good (fair) offer.
Carlo would greatly improve the Jets right side D ( I may over rate his abilities but thinking he would paly opposite Morrissey) DeBrusk will replace some of the offense lost by trading Scheifele. A 20 something 1st is still a 1st.
IMO with Carolina it would go like this:
We want Jarvis. They won't do Jarvis.
So it turns into:
- Necas who is sort of their DeBrusk equivalent,
- Morrow, Drury and a pick instead of Carlo & Lysell
More futures, less current players but still a middle 6 right shot winger, a right handed Dman with upside, a center prospect + a pick due to the uncertainty with all the prospects.
With Carlo and DeBrusk you're getting players in their prime so we know what we'd be getting. With prospects their progression isn't as certain. Can Drury break into the NHL or not? Will Morrow sign with the Jets after college or not? (Nathan Smith just bolted on us)
scarbrow21
Registered User
gojetsgo
Registered User
- Nov 1, 2015
- 9,975
- 28,000
General Fanager
Registered User
