Andy6
Court Jetster
I thought that Atlanta's mortal sin was that they rushed players. Now ours is apparently that we don't rush players.
Good post. I will say that I'm much happier with Mark getting lots of minutes in the OHL then riding the pine here and playing 8 minutes a game.
I agree with your point that this organization doesn't seem to be all on the same wavelength. Case in point what the heck was Redmond doing in the pressbox while Clitsome kept playing awful. I personally believe that we have the wrong coach for this organization, it took Buff getting injured to give him a shot. Its also not like he didn't have any pro-seasoning he's a two time AHL allstar. This organization is really starting to baffle me.
What about Landeskog? Brandon Saad? Andrew Shaw? look past the first round dude. Plus Barchi and Olesiak are still both possibilities as well.
Its ok, he'll be in St. John's next season .
This is what you said, nothing to do with age or anything, just peers which you ended up saying was his draft class.He's gotten more NHL time than most of his peers...
Who said anything about draftmates having 4-5 years of pro experience?Yeah my bad, I missed 'em by accident, I'll edit them in. Shaw was more intentional as he was picked as a much older guy. He essentially had to play pro (I'm counting AHL also as a pro league) this year and last due to age.
Baertschi and Oleksiak I'm very unsure of. Both are able to play AHL and their teams haven't committed them to the big league over the A, so I thought it incorrect to infer they would end up with more games. Maybe with more injuries, we'll see. Although in the same vein I think if Scheifele was older and able to play in the AHL he would have the same opportunity to bounce up and down, so I think it makes those two a mute point. Just my belief however.
I don't think Lando or Saad change what I'm saying though. Even with the others, I don't think the additional max of 5 guys swings things. Especially when you count my assumption that Scheifele will make the big club in 1-2 years. Making it completely impossible for any draftmates to have 4-5 years of pro experience on him.
I love hfboards logic....
Let's clear up some things without ANY subjective views... IE: some of my comments will help both sides of any of the current arguments.
1) Jets are using a top9 system, not a top6... Most of the hard match-ups are spread out between the top3 lines (Noel does most to Ladd/Little line) and what he does to the 4th line is basically throw them out in the D-zone 90% of the time to work very-very uphill...
2) There's more than one way to skin a cat. Not looking at any of the details, this decision does not determine anything in particular of Scheifele's worth, development or ceiling, nor does it determine anything about him relative to his draft class....
3) Stop looking at boxcar stats... Especially when looking at small sample sizes (ex: Burmistrov in AHL, Scheifele in AHL/NHL, Wellwood this season). There is so much that usage does to a person's production and also small sample sizes can skew no matter how good/weak a player is.
4) If Scheifele never, ever, ever becomes better than Couturier or Hamilton, it doesn't mean that any one particular side is right in how the picks and the process. Too many variables and it's far more complicated than that. Just like if Scheifele becomes better doesn't prove the other side or mean necessarily that Chevy and co were right. Also, it's not typical for any player from a particular draft class to stay consistently better than his closely drafted peers.
5) Let's stop it with the huge exaggerations... both sides please.
6) Scheifele was a "reach" in the sense that most public draft rankings had him placed higher, but let's not say stupid things like he's a 3rd rounder or 10-20 pick reach. The most recent available drafts had him later but not that much (Future Considerations 13, The Scouting Report 10, TSN 12, etc).
This is what you said, nothing to do with age or anything, just peers which you ended up saying was his draft class.
Who said anything about draftmates having 4-5 years of pro experience?
at this rate he won't make the big club for another 2-3 years, similar to Kadri. At that point, other players in same draft class will already have 4-5 pro years under their belt. I like the kid and am rooting for him but it looks like Chevy made the wrong choice.
How is Telegin progressing? I havent heard his name in a while.
I thought that Atlanta's mortal sin was that they rushed players. Now ours is apparently that we don't rush players.
I don't understand all the moaning about how the Jets are not putting in their young rookies in the line up. This is a shortened season so you have little time to gamble or test the waters. Priority is to get your top players going and playing for a good start and to get into playoffs before anything else. By pushing the young guys up in the line up, yeah maybe they can develop and turn into something or maybe they don't but at the same time they are taking a spot from the other top guys. The possibility of wasting time with a shortened season is just not worth the risk.
Also I get why they didn't put Redmond over Clitsome because really who do you choose? The one with more NHL experience and you know how he plays or take a leap of faith and choose the one with zip? Thankfully Redmond seems to hold his own out there when he got put into the lineup but what if he didn't?
And now back on topic, there just wasn't room for Scheifele and honestly whenever he was on the ice he clearly looked like a rookie. Yeah he had energy but you already have other guys who can do that and young guys like Burmi who stills need to be pushed up in the lineup. Why force something that wasn't going to work? Sheifele isn't quite ready yet. Hopefully he will be next season. For the time being he can go down in Barrie where he will have a bigger role. It's a short season guys.... it's not end of the world that Sheifele isn't in the line up this year.
The person I replied to with the post you replied to.
Edit: This one by morningwood:
Agree... Slow down if Atlanta would have taken their time with Kane burmi and bogo we would be a better orginaization IMHO
Now I remember , I knew I didn't say that.
Kane wouldn't have learned anything else in junior, but I agree with Burmie and to lesser extent Bogosian.
Agree... Slow down if Atlanta would have taken their time with Kane burmi and bogo we would be a better orginaization IMHO
Interesting to note that the Blue Jackets just sent down their first pick Ryan Johanasson to the AHL. Similar center to Scheifele but year older, certainly hope the Blue Jackets aren't in the process of ruining another quality center prospect. As much as I'm not happy with how Jets handled Scheifele this year, I am glad that the atleast decided not keep him up playing all year oj the fourth line like Columbus did with Ryan.
I'm actually not sure if Bogosian wasn't ready. He was very physically developed for his age.
He suffered some bumps along the road, but I'm not sure he was rushed. I think he was ready personally.
I love hfboards logic....
Let's clear up some things without ANY subjective views... IE: some of my comments will help both sides of any of the current arguments.
1) Jets are using a top9 system, not a top6... Most of the hard match-ups are spread out between the top3 lines (Noel does most to Ladd/Little line) and what he does to the 4th line is basically throw them out in the D-zone 90% of the time to work very-very uphill...
2) There's more than one way to skin a cat. Not looking at any of the details, this decision does not determine anything in particular of Scheifele's worth, development or ceiling, nor does it determine anything about him relative to his draft class....
3) Stop looking at boxcar stats... Especially when looking at small sample sizes (ex: Burmistrov in AHL, Scheifele in AHL/NHL, Wellwood this season). There is so much that usage does to a person's production and also small sample sizes can skew no matter how good/weak a player is.
4) If Scheifele never, ever, ever becomes better than Couturier or Hamilton, it doesn't mean that any one particular side is right in how the picks and the process. Too many variables and it's far more complicated than that. Just like if Scheifele becomes better doesn't prove the other side or mean necessarily that Chevy and co were right. Also, it's not typical for any player from a particular draft class to stay consistently better than his closely drafted peers.
5) Let's stop it with the huge exaggerations... both sides please.
6) Scheifele was a "reach" in the sense that most public draft rankings had him placed higher, but let's not say stupid things like he's a 3rd rounder or 10-20 pick reach. The most recent available drafts had him later but not that much (Future Considerations 13, The Scouting Report 10, TSN 12, etc).
Bogosian may not have been rushed, but I'm not so sure more time in junior wouldn't have hurt him. In that case there is an easy comparison in Alex Pietrangelo. They were both roughly the same size and drafted after one another. While Bogosian was trying to compete at the NHL level and getting worn down against men, AP was getting a taste of the NHL and going back to junior. He had a couple of great years with long playoff runs in junior. Now AP is knocking on the door of a Norris trophy...
Maybe the Jets will have Scheifele on the Pietrangelo path instead of the Bogosian one...
I thought that Atlanta's mortal sin was that they rushed players. Now ours is apparently that we don't rush players.