Lunatik
Registered User
- Oct 12, 2012
- 56,250
- 8,384
It's hard to say, Jankowski is quite responsible defensively so he could be used at C.I doubt Jankowski gets centre ice duties to start, more likely he starts on the wing.
It's hard to say, Jankowski is quite responsible defensively so he could be used at C.I doubt Jankowski gets centre ice duties to start, more likely he starts on the wing.
In fairness the 2012 draft was a pretty ****** draftWord on the street is that he could be the best player from the 2012 draft.
Just needs to be better than Hampus Lindholm, Filip Forsberg and Alex Galchenyuk. It's certainly not impossible within a few years. Fingers crossed.
Canucks would promote Weisbrod to GMHow ****ing funny would it be if he wound up being a top guy in that draft.
Almost put my beer through the tv when we made that pick!
Credit where it's due, they saw a something. Worst case, he'll be a bottom 6 guy IMO.
Actually, I'm satisfied if he's as good as / better than Ceci, Hertl, and/or Teravainen.Just needs to be better than Hampus Lindholm, Filip Forsberg and Alex Galchenyuk. It's certainly not impossible within a few years. Fingers crossed.
I'm a little surprised he was called up at this point. It's less a matter of whether he's deserving or not, but rather about his long term development.
That being said, I'd much rather see Jankowski as Versteeg's replacement and in the lineup as the third line centre, with Stajan on the LW, than Shinkaruk.
It's hard to say, Jankowski is quite responsible defensively so he could be used at C.
The fact this thread is not titled Janko Unchained is a massive disappointment.
The fact this thread is not titled Janko Unchained is a massive disappointment.
Just needs to be better than Hampus Lindholm, Filip Forsberg and Alex Galchenyuk. It's certainly not impossible within a few years. Fingers crossed.
The fact this thread is not titled Janko Unchained is a massive disappointment.