Draiskull
Registered User
- Oct 26, 2005
- 23,344
- 2,192
I hope he's ok and this is just a CBA loop hole. He's still a very valuable player and will be very difficult for Chicago to replace.
so you hope he is a liar and Hawks are in on it?
I hope he's ok and this is just a CBA loop hole. He's still a very valuable player and will be very difficult for Chicago to replace.
Yes but why cant anyone understand...maybe its worth it to him to struggle through it for 5 million but not for 1 million..
If you had a job that physically hurt you wouldnt it make a difference if you made minimum wage or 35 bucks an hour.
Which is fine - but then he should retire. If he can still physically play, but just doesn't want to endure for $1 million a year, then that's not LTIR.
Which is fine - but then he should retire. If he can still physically play, but just doesn't want to endure for $1 million a year, then that's not LTIR.
Thanks for the expert opinion on pain and symptom management, Doc.
People who have no idea what pain or side effects Hossa would have to "endure" to play this season are in no position to tell him what he should do.
People who have no idea what pain or side effects Hossa would have to "endure" to play this season are in no position to tell him what he should do.
Nobody is telling Hossa what he should do. There's not a single person here who has a problem with Hossa not playing next season.
Make the Hawks suffer their cap penalties and everybody (except Chicago) will be happy.
FWIW: I don't necessarily agree with the cap penalties. Whatever they did with Hossa's contract was allowed at the time. However, if the league hands out a penalty and then we never see them enforced, credibility of the NHL takes a hit each time it happens and ultimately it won't be good for the league. Stuff like this has to stop at some point so might as well start now.
What happens when Zetterberg wants to retire? Luongo? What will we see then?
The league lost credibility when they allowed these kinds of contracts to be signed in the first place, and then realized they screwed up and came up with the whole cap recapture penalty after the fact.
...and then gave teams the opportunity to get out of them to avoid any chance they'd be faced with the issue.
They were obviously so bad that we heard about this for the 20 seasons that he's been playing.People who have no idea what pain or side effects Hossa would have to "endure" to play this season are in no position to tell him what he should do.
The real farce is the cap recapture applying to deals that were done before the rule existed. The CBA outlines everything about how contracts will work. The Hawks, and other teams signed contracts that worked under those rules and that were approved by the NHL. Then the NHL, after the fact, changes the rules to apply to deals already signed. It's a complete joke.
They were obviously so bad that we heard about this for the 20 seasons that he's been playing.
Yeah, but that's a moot point. Because the NHL had to compensate for coming up with the cap recapture penalty out of the blue after the deals were already signed and approved by the league. They're essentially giving teams a free pass because of their own ridiculous decision to penalize teams after the fact, despite their own league/people approving the deals prior.
Trust me, I don't disagree with you.
I've been very vocally against retroactively punishing teams for contracts with rules brought in long after the ink was dry, and I've specifically been very against the stupid ass formula they use which screws everything up after a player has been traded.
With that said, the NHL has stubbornly gone forward with the cap recapture penalty and trying to circumvent is not the answer IMO.
I don't have all the details and will gladly change my tune if something big is revealed, but this whole situation looks and smells fishy. The timing is just too good for this to suddenly be an issue on a 20+ year career once his salary drops to $1M and his team badly needs LTIR space.
and the hawks decided that using his long term, 'fake' cap hit contract was in their best interest, so they didn't use it on him.
Now, the situation exists where you may have to face those penalties. You don't get to have it both ways. You were given an out and chose not to use it (I wouldnt have either. Ill take 3 cups and deal with the consequences later as well).
and the hawks decided that using his long term, 'fake' cap hit contract was in their best interest, so they didn't use it on him.
Now, the situation exists where you may have to face those penalties. You don't get to have it both ways. You were given an out and chose not to use it (I wouldnt have either. Ill take 3 cups and deal with the consequences later as well).
Can't blame them for trying, i'd do the same thing.
If the NHL allows it, it's their fault.
I think you're misunderstanding. The LTIR designation given to numerous players on these types of contracts IS the free pass I'm talking about.
Gotcha. If Hossa can not physically play hockey because of this, LTIR is a perfectly acceptable alternative, I agree.
I don't think anyone denies that the timing is fishy, including Hawks fans. But, at the same time... things get progressively worse over time, do they not? Particularly with some kind of degenerative disorder.
Cancer, for example? If not caught in time, spreads, and gets progressively worse. MS is another. Alzheimer's. The lists go on and on with things that progressively get worse until they're completely unmanageable.
Is it so hard to think that it's just coincidence that it has gotten progressively worse/detrimental to his health and life moving forward, that he decided now was the time? I mean, from everything I've read on it... it's been a long-documented issue by the Hawks organization, with a long history of medical information regarding it, going so far as to release that he has blood tests done every few weeks because of it.
Which brings up the scenario where any player with any type of degenerative injury would be LTIR eligible.
Does that include back spasms? Any slightly misaligned disk could get worse by playing professional hockey? Shoulder or Knee injuries? Etc Do those player take medication for whatever ails them which may not really be good for them to be on constantly?
So if the NHL allows this with Hossa, why would any team not use this line of reasoning to just put pretty much any player onto LTIR once they wanted to?
I'm not saying the Hawks, Hossa or anyone is doing anything nefarious, I just don't know where this slippery slope ends. And I'm not being altruistic or anything, I'd like to know why the Rangers did not go this route with Girardi instead of a buyout, he must have a medical record about as thick as war and peace.