Maybe they can get a medical exception for Kucherov so they don't have to protect him
I think Kuch was injured in the playoffs so he might have to go on the LTIR again.
Maybe they can get a medical exception for Kucherov so they don't have to protect him
Ah ok. Wasn't 100% on that. ThanksThat's how many no trade/modified no trade/no move.
Modified NMC/NMC have to be proteceted
Modified NTC/NTC do not.
They only have 4 NMC rest are NTC/L-NTC
I would burn those picks to the ground as long as I keep winning cups. They will fall hard when it all comes to an end but who cares at that point.They already don't have a 2021 1st, 2021 2nd or 2022 2nd.
Basically they will have to trade their 2022 1st or even dip into their 2023 picks to make it happen...
Also almost all of their guys will have some sort of trade protection lists they can submit to block atleast 10+ teams (are there even more than 10 teams entertaining taking on salary dumps?)
I doubt anyone will voluntarily want to leave the 2 time Stanley Cup winner with no state tax in Florida.
Lets see if BriseBois finds a way to cheat himself out of making some very tough decisions again or if it is time to pay up.
Tampa Bay doesn't really have bad contracts. Gourde & Johnson are both a little overpaid, but not by a lot.
Teams just don't want to help Tampa without a significant asset attached.
TJ had 29 points in 78 games total. He's already slow and has 3 more years at $5m. That's a bad contract.
He's also not getting the ice-time, deployment, or linemates that he once had.
I definitely don't think he is anywhere close to his peak—but he could be a smart bet on a team that has a top-six role open for him.
A smart bet if he's coming with two first round picks or a pick and their best prospect.
For $5m you can get Danault; heck Taylor Hall might only go for $5.5m.
No, only Full No Move Clauses (NMC) have to be protectedWhen I look at Tampa on Cap Friendly they have 7 forwards with a modified or full no move. Do they have to protect all players with a modified also? If so they can’t protect Brayden Point
He's also not getting the ice-time, deployment, or linemates that he once had.
I definitely don't think he is anywhere close to his peak—but he could be a smart bet on a team that has a top-six role open for him.
You don't think the GM's are more concerned about making their own teams better than screwing Tampa up?Nobody will be helping them out unless extreme overpayment lol
Definitely a bad contract, but if you think johnson is slow I'm guessing you didn't see any tb playoff games.TJ had 29 points in 78 games total. He's already slow and has 3 more years at $5m. That's a bad contract.
A smart bet if he's coming with two first round picks or a pick and their best prospect.
For $5m you can get Danault; heck Taylor Hall might only go for $5.5m.
You don't think the GM's are more concerned about making their own teams better than screwing Tampa up?
LOL, TJ is terrible value at 5M. Filth! No one is taking that contract.Danault isn’t much better than Johnson. Tbh I’d rather have Johnson on my 2nd line than Danault
LOL, TJ is terrible value at 5M. Filth! No one is taking that contract.
When I look at Tampa on Cap Friendly they have 7 forwards with a modified or full no move. Do they have to protect all players with a modified also? If so they can’t protect Brayden Point
Add a 1st to Point et voilà you could move Cirelli to Minnesota.
Tampa Bay doesn't really have bad contracts. Gourde & Johnson are both a little overpaid, but not by a lot.
Teams just don't want to help Tampa without a significant asset attached.