If those "real" fans who were cheering for wins, would have seen their beloved Leafs win just a mere +5 more games this year, then the Leafs would have finished with 79 points and been drafting #8 overall.
If their loyal cheering had returned +10 more wins on the season their cherished Leafs would be drafting #13 and just ahead of the Bruins.
Cheering for wins, but enduring losses and the Leafs finishing 30th must have been worst case possible scenario for them and most disappointing end for their year long support.
On the silver lining side of things, those so called "non-real" Leaf fans that were cheering for losses, can't stop jumping around with unbridled enthusiasm, struggling to maintain composure, and control their excitement and emotions, knowing that the team they cheer for will be drafting #1 overall. Its exactly what they were cheering for and exactly what the end result was. Wining the draft lottery the next best thing to winning the Stanley Cup this year for a non playoff team fan base.
Looks like on paper the non-real diehard Leaf fans, and the Leafs themselves are the ones coming out the big winners on the season. Those who were cheering for wins better luck next year, and things are looking better for them in the future. So its a win win for everyone I suppose.
Mess, Mess, Mess. What a tangled web we weave.
People who are against the notion of tanking fully understand the concept that higher picks have higher chances of becoming impact players. What they don't support or in many cases do not want to be associated with is the lowering of oneself to certain levels for a notion that is foolhardy at best.
You can argue if you want that being a tanker is a somehow "enlightened" position, that of a person who sees the forest for the trees, that in cheering against the team you are really cheering for them.
Problem is, you are entitled to your own opinions but not your own facts.
To date there have been 52 first overall selections. Do you know how many have won Cups? 13. A grand 25%.
So having a first overall in and of itself simply doesn't carry much weight. You know what all those that won had in common? Incredibly deep teams outside of themselves.
They were all very good at doing what some of us have been saying for years: draft well (no matter where you land), sign well, trade well. There's no great secret.
If Matthews is successful in Toronto it will be because of all the other depth we build around him by drafting well no matter where we land (see Brown), signing well (see Soshnikov) and trading well (see Carrick).
The notion that you have to draft #1 overall or even in the lottery has never had any merit and has been disproven by many teams that stay successful for years without being there.
You'll just have to pardon the "anti-tankers" for not supporting cheering against their team. For not applauding injuries to their team. For not being upset at wins that may alter their draft position but that provide crippled children with possibly the highest moment of their lives. Or forever bemoaning a player who has toiled their whole life to play at the top and who has a great night after being rewarded with one final shot at the show. These are all things I've watched "tank nation" do and all levels I have no interest in stooping to.
Most of us who have lived enough life to know what is and isn't important know hockey is just grown men chasing a rubber disk and certainly not worth debasing ourselves over by hoping people get hurt and ignoring the joy of kids who dream of hockey. We also know that good teams are historically successful no matter where they draft. So no, losing a bunch of games is not very hard to endure when you support your team or when you have some life perspective or when you can find happiness in people doing something great or kids having a great experience.