Actually we don't know what the Leafs were willing to pay. It's impossible to know. Perhaps the Leafs and Kadri met in the middle before Leafs went to their absolute max.
Again. One team. Only team. If Kadri says he took a discount it's only applicable to the team that is bidding.
No offer sheets. No tampering. No else is allowed to bid. Open market is years and a fluctuating Canadian dollar away.
One team.
So if we can't know what the Leafs were prepared to pay, he can't know what the Leafs were willing to pay.
No one believes he crossed out $36m and out 27m and initialled it.
And therefore it's all smoke.
What you place on the listing =/= market value. Otherwise you're negotiating against yourself as buyers expect to negotiate down from your ask price.
It seems we keep going in circles with your position on RFA or UFA players unable to be perceived as taking discounts unless there is a firm offer with more money. This means that plenty of players like Hamhuis or Sedins, etc have never signed discount deals because they never went to UFA. I cannot imagine a credible argument for the above position so I am going to remove myself from this discussion.
Your house example is flawed though in that there are multiple buyers. RFAs without offer sheets don't have that.
If you had only only one qualified buyer, it might work.
You could want $10m for your house. The buyer says no, $500k.
You go back and forth. Maybe include the appliances. You wiggle the buyer up a little but ultimately they have leverage since they are the only qualified buyer out there.
You settle on a price and it looks a lot like the $500k since you need to sell and there are no other qualified buyers out there.
You can't then go to your friends and say, yeah I really liked that guy. I gave him a 95% discount off what my house was worth.
It's was never worth 10m. It's only worth what someone was willing to pay.