Water under the bridge from a value perspective given his NMC. In the context of a resigning, a short term contract not significantly below what he is taking in right now in salary seems sensible.
Because putting the puck into an empty net is important, but PP production isn't.
So, what is his annual $$$.long term, 5.5 or 6.0.
Why would you put a restriction on how he gets his points...all the other top centres play PP1 too
try betting against them, they always seem to show up and get the W when i do it. Sadly no one is helping me financially so i havent been able to do it for awhile.
Zach Hyman would be real good in Leafs top 6 again. We know the fit is there on either of Leafs top lines.
I re-inserted him among Leafs point scorers to see how he would fit.
View attachment 630230
His 11 goals in 16 playoff games last year would really be of interest here for the Leafs this year.,
Yes the team would look different but they wouldn’t need to lose Nylander and Rielly
Nylander OR Reilly! ? Or 2 players like Kerfoot at 3.5m and maybe Brodie...we couldn't afford that.
That's certainly not what I said, but if that's your only response....Because putting the puck into an empty net is important, but PP production isn't.
I didn't. I just said that other than that, he doesn't seem to get much.
Except it kind of is what you said, when you selectively picked out the one metric that included empty net points but excluded PP points, in order to make Tavares look the worst.
