I absolutely do But I don't think he's effective with our style of play, or against a lot of the teams we play. I'd put him in vs the Caps every time thoughI do find it hard to believe someone named after an ogre AND godzilla wouldn't LOVE a brutish enforcer lol lol
I understand why they acquired a player like him. I think we needed a power forward for this team. We don’t really have any really physical forwards.Do you really not see why he's playing? I'm not asking if you agree with why he's playing, I'm asking if you understand why he's playing. It's the same as Laraque or Goddard. Nobody thought those guys were playing for their hockey skills. Neither is Reaves.
JR has decided that Sid and Geno taking less abuse is more important than having a more effective 4RW.
Then JR would get more criticism about the trade and, yeah, I think there’s an element of ego involved with this. It’s just such a move away from what made this team successful and Sullivan seemingly doesn’t like playing Reaves much. There was also that token attempt at trying him on the PK in the preseason. It’s just damn weird. Unless Reaves is something like a 13F those problems aren't going away.
I'm hoping that changes come playoffs. Considering he just gets completely benched for full periods on occasion, I have to think Sully recognizes it.
If you think we brought him in to be a power forward, then no you don't understand why we brought him in.I understand why they acquired a player like him. I think we needed a power forward for this team. We don’t really have any really physical forwards.
But Reaves wasn’t the solution. It was a panic move in which we heavily overpaid. If all you wanted was a goon then friggin find one in the AHL and don’t waste the cap hit and more importantly, assets, on a guy like Reaves.
I understand we needed a physical winger but JR screwed the pooch here. Power forwards are difficult to find but there was no reason to overpay that much for a guy like Reaves.
JR failed to address many deficiencies with this team. What’s one more?
I think so. But if we were playing a team like Washington, Columbus, or NYR in the playoffs, I'd advocate Reaves being on the team (at least if they got up to their old antics the previous game) because he'd actually serve a purpose.
Playing Reaves against speed/finesse teams who've never taken the sort of liberties we've seen from Nisky, Dubinsky, Wilson, Staal etc is pointless, but we're doing it anyway. Play him against the *******s who only think they can win by wearing our best players down with targeted cheap shots.
Yeah, I'm not trying to argue that our 4th line is good or anything. I'm just saying that it's silly to point at 4LW as a spot that JR knowingly left a hole this summer.
]I think Reaves really was effective in St Louis. They just play a much different game than we do. He does do things well. I saw at least one occasion last night where a Leafs d-man simply didn't go for a puck in the corner with Reaves following him in.
Sadly, the things he does poorly are very important to how we play. And he matches up poorly against the top teams in the East.
So, part of what makes the Reaves trade weird is that while he may have fit in that St. Louis team, like you said, it’s really not the Pens. Ignoring the skating away and just keep playing philosophy. They added a hulking player who's got good speed for his size to a fast skating team in the East. He’s nowhere near skilled enough to make up for that.
Now you have Sullivan with a winger he won’t play on a team based on waves of attack wearing opposing teams down. They added fast for a tank on skates to a speed system predicated on constant skating to really work. In the beginning of the season I even questioned if Reaves' offseason had prepared him for this system vs what he was in before.
Is Crosby's health crucial to our success? Yes.
Has Crosby's health been put in jeopardy by targeted cheap shots the last couple years? Yes.
Is Reaves the best enforcer in the league? Yes.
Could the best enforcer in the league cut down those targeted cheap shots? Maybe, early returns suggest he is.
Can Reaves take a regular shift better than any enforcer in the league? Yes.
Do we need Reaves to play every game, even when there are no serious threats on the opposing team and we have better options sitting on the sidelines? No.
I don't see why any egos should take issue with that though. Reaves has been doing what we brought him in to do. Sid and Geno are not being seeing the repeated, targeted attacks from the dregs of the league like they've seen the last couple years. But like EightyOne said, there's no point playing him against Toronto.
I think so. But if we were playing a team like Washington, Columbus, or NYR in the playoffs, I'd advocate Reaves being on the team (at least if they got up to their old antics the previous game) because he'd actually serve a purpose.
Playing Reaves against speed/finesse teams who've never taken the sort of liberties we've seen from Nisky, Dubinsky, Wilson, Staal etc is pointless, but we're doing it anyway. Play him against the *******s who only think they can win by wearing our best players down with targeted cheap shots.
I understand why they acquired a player like him. I think we needed a power forward for this team. We don’t really have any really physical forwards.
But Reaves wasn’t the solution. It was a panic move in which we heavily overpaid. If all you wanted was a goon then friggin find one in the AHL and don’t waste the cap hit and more importantly, assets, on a guy like Reaves.
I understand we needed a physical winger but JR screwed the pooch here. Power forwards are difficult to find but there was no reason to overpay that much for a guy like Reaves.
JR failed to address many deficiencies with this team. What’s one more?
The Pens don't need Reaves, they need a Matt Cooke. Someone that other teams fear because if they take out Crosby/Malkin, Cooke will take a 10 game suspension to take out the other teams best players. He was also a decent 3rd liner and good on the pk.
Has he been targeted much in the regular season? I don’t see a difference. Seems it’s more the playoffs where the incentive to win a cup will be the factor of why this **** happens. Reaves won’t be deterring that but he will hurt us by making us worse.
That I don't get, just because they didn't go over the top doesn't take away they are a bigger bruising team. They do dress Martin. I think it's foolish to exclude Toronto. In a playoff series they would be just as likely to target if they want to get past the reigning champs. That's been the MO for every single team the past two years in the playoffs. That's the sole biggest reason Reaves is here.
I agree that he doesn't need to be an every game player, but the teams that can hurt you the most he should.
I'd rather dress 7 D-men then see Reaves in the lineup every game.
Reaves prevents nothing. As Sid And Geno have been cheapshotted just as much as any other year..
and yet he plays. That tells me Crosby/Geno/whoever REALLY want him there.
I'm hoping he's not a regular come playoff time. Goddard played 71 games in 2008-2009, and zero playoff games. Now, Reaves is a clearly better hockey player than Goddard, but I still hope this ends up similarly.
Agreed. If we build the rest of the line right I actually think he can be effective against those teams anyway. But I would want us to consider sitting him vs teams like Tampa and Toronto. Right now we aren't.But the real abuse tends to happen in the playoffs from the Wilsons, Dubinskys, etc.
If you bench Reaves for those games, then what? I’m not saying I buy the enforcer thing anyway, but pretending I do, I’d probably want him playing against those guys.
Agreed. If we build the rest of the line right I actually think he can be effective against those teams anyway. But I would want us to consider sitting him vs teams like Tampa and Toronto. Right now we aren't.
Agreed. They'd be missing some raw talent, but that's probably going to be true in most of our realistic options.Agreed. I’d have no problem with a Simon/Archie or even Rowney-Cullen-Reaves line for example. The issue was never Reaves in isolation, other than price, it was the combo of players and a bad 4the line center. I suppose Sheahan could be okay there, but the other winger would need to be fast.
If you want to blame losses like these on Ryan Reaves I got news for you. The guy is averaging about 6 minutes a game. If you want to understand the Penguins biggest issue you have to look at the goaltending position. Murray has been great but he is injured ( frequently it seems ) and has only started 111 games during his career and that includes playoffs. Most of his starts have come against many of the same teams. The 2 goaltenders on the active roster right now have ( DeSmith 0 NHL starts Jarry 8 NHL starts ) have little experience, are just pups ( 22 & 23 ). There is no replacement for experience and this all could have been predicted prior to allowing Fleury to leave town so you could pay Dumo, Maata, Schultz. Fleury's near 700 NHL start experience isn't even on the bench to help the young guys. I would look for JR to make a move for a veteran back -up at this stage. Lets be clear 2 back to back games against a team ( Buffalo ) on a huge shut out streak isn't hard. The last 3 games the Pens gave up 11 goals against the Rangers, Isles, and Leafs which is like a 3.66 GA average.The 3 games prior the Pens gave up 4 goals to the Flyers, 2 to the Lightening and 4 to the Preds. Very little experience between the pipes in Pittsburgh this year.