Yes but do you really want to build a defensive group with such a small D in it? The hockey sense is super elite, but still, he is limited physically and was protected tonight, and opposing teams will adjust to him and he will become a target. That's the hockey mentality even in this modern era. Yes he he was not bad, but we are far away from being able to project him as a complete first pairing D. To me there is not much new to take away from this first game. We all knew he was gifted offensively, very intelligent on the ice, but with huge physical limitations to play in his zone.
He is a work in progress and I am on the fence but even though I don't like the Hughes/Fox comparisons he does have something that they don't and that is his fierce competitiveness. I am not saying that Hughes and Fox aren't competitors but Lane has a whole other level of compete and has a little venom in his game.
He will need to get stronger/heavier and he will need to continue to improve his back skating but he is unusually hard to knock down for such a tiny player which is something that I value.
I have tried to take a balanced and honest approach to his development and I would classify his debut as being very positive as he held up well in the corners and defended better than I expected him to. The negative points that he got burned on were positional issues that should be expected from and dman in such a high stakes NHL debut, especially without having a single practice or skate with the team prior to the game.
I am sure that teams are going to start targeting him on breakouts and faster players are going to try and exploit his back skating so when that happens we shouldn't freak out as it is just something that he will have to improve on.
I expect him to start in Laval next season and it will be interesting to see what kind of condition he is in after a full off season of training for the pro game.