I'm going to keep myself grounded with he's playing in the KHL and therefore means nothing when it comes to the NHL.
Still means absolutely nothing till it happens.This is false. There is actually a strong correlation between producing big numbers in KHL as a youngster and translating that success into the NHL. It happens way more often than not. So the odds are heavily on Kirill's side.
While it doesn't guarantee anything, it certainly doesn't mean absolutely nothing either. Every thing that a prospect does in his development means something.Still means absolutely nothing till it happens.
It means they can play well in those leagues.While it doesn't guarantee anything, it certainly doesn't mean absolutely nothing either. Every thing that a prospect does in his development means something.
Well, I guess that you've got it all figured out. You should let all the teams know how much money that they're wasting by scouting all of these leagues.It means they can play well in those leagues.
All I'm saying is it is a non-guarantee that he is going to match the hype he has as the next Tarasenko or Kucherov.Well, I guess that you've got it all figured out. You should let all the teams know how much money that they're wasting by scouting all of these leagues.
No, that's what I and others are saying. You said that it means absolutely nothing. Twice.All I'm saying is it is a non-guarantee that he is going to match the hype he has as the next Tarasenko or Kucherov.
Stats outside the NHL guarantee nothing. They mean nothing to NHL stats. Linus Omark is a featured player in the KHL. Didn’t stick around the NHL long. So Kaprizov put up similar stats to Kucherov. I’m sure there are other players who were near that who didn’t crack the NHL. KHL stats have no meaning to NHL stats. Just shows they can play in a tier lower league.No, that's what I and others are saying. You said that it means absolutely nothing. Twice.
Stats outside the NHL guarantee nothing. They mean nothing to NHL stats. Linus Omark is a featured player in the KHL. Didn’t stick around the NHL long. So Kaprizov put up similar stats to Kucherov. I’m sure there are other players who were near that who didn’t crack the NHL. KHL stats have no meaning to NHL stats. Just shows they can play in a tier lower league.
Well, right, technically they "mean nothing", but it's all information that can be used to evaluate a prospect. Playing this well in the KHL means he is probably much more likely to be a good NHL player than someone who struggles in the KHL, no?Stats outside the NHL guarantee nothing. They mean nothing to NHL stats. Linus Omark is a featured player in the KHL. Didn’t stick around the NHL long. So Kaprizov put up similar stats to Kucherov. I’m sure there are other players who were near that who didn’t crack the NHL. KHL stats have no meaning to NHL stats. Just shows they can play in a tier lower league.
Stats outside the NHL guarantee nothing. They mean nothing to NHL stats. Linus Omark is a featured player in the KHL. Didn’t stick around the NHL long. So Kaprizov put up similar stats to Kucherov. I’m sure there are other players who were near that who didn’t crack the NHL. KHL stats have no meaning to NHL stats. Just shows they can play in a tier lower league.
Perfect way to summarize it.Another way of putting it is "his scoring doesn't mean everything, but it also doesn't mean nothing."
By all means, get amped. Get amped about any prospect that does well! Just don't come around yelling bust if the player doesn't meet your expectations and needs time to adjust to the VERY DIFFERENT game that is the NHL.i guess i dont understand how people can get amped up over north american prospects who have never played a game in the nhl but think nothing of a euro prospect whose breaking records? thats a head scratcher.
Nasty ^^
25 points in 23 games, that's good, right?
Also, his shooting percentage is 30.8%