BinCookin
Registered User
I wonder what the difference is (if any) between a high 20 something pick and #12?
I get what you're saying about the #6 pick overall - just that Holland is the type that might listen to offers.
Solid Question which i can actually answer.
As you all know i redrafted a lot of the draft years and can tell you all the 12 vs 20th picks:
Year: 12th pick vs 20th pick
2005: Hornqvist vs Sobotka
2006: Brassard vs C. Stewart
2007: Muzzin vs B. Sutter
2008: Henrique vs Scandella
2009: M. Hoffman vs Kulikov
2010: Faulk vs K. Hayes
2011: Zibanejad vs Manson
2012: Galchenyuk vs Skjei
(I.e. a pretty solid difference)
these are redraft positions so eliminates busts and includes all home run picks.
Edit: Oh, I also noticed I misread the question... High 20 something pick would be much much worse than 20.
Actual Drafts:
2005: M. Staal vs McArdle
2006: B. Little vs D. Fischer
2007: McDonagh vs Esposito
2008: Myers vs Del Zotto
2009: De Haan vs Josefson
2010: Fowler vs B. Bennett
2011: R. Murphy vs C. Murphy
2012: Grigorenko vs S. Laughton
I think #20 has been uncharacteristically a crappy pick for a while.
But there is a big difference between 12 and 20 IMO.
In reality huge difference
In a Re-draft, still fairly significant
Edit: i just saw you said high 20 something not "20" exactly...
so if we are talking our #27.... its going to be a massive difference.
Last edited: