Is this thread really neccessary? Don't mean jack shit if he has the worst +/- of the rookies, because he's been playing great the last couple games.
Thanks for the concern. Much appreciated! Anyways, our concern as Ranger fans was he wasn’t NHL ready. Well the last 3-4 games he’s looked great so I’m not quite sure exactly what you’re going on about. Thanks for the advice though what the Rangers should do with their team!I am able to focus on more than just one player, thanks though. There is no need to be personal, screams inferiority complex to me.
Kakko is playing horrible, his skating is terribad and his shooting is underwhelming. He is the one dragging his own teammates down, not the other way around. And the stats back that up. Same as Gusev for the Devils but worse.
Kakko is one guy who would benefit a lot if he played in the AHL. Get used to NA ice but actually being able to compete. Same as Rantanen.
+/- is a meaningless stat
now you try to imply it means something for a ROOKIE on a SUBPAR TEAM.
pathetic thread
LoL at using +/- to try and prove something.
+/- is a garbage stat.
Oh please you guys have used +/- when it is convinient to **** on Ovechkin. When it's not convinient like when Mario Lemieux gets the exact same bad +/- you say it's meaningless.
Might go down as the biggest bust since Tavares
Oh please you guys have used +/- when it is convinient to **** on Ovechkin. When it's not convinient like when Mario Lemieux gets the exact same bad +/- you say it's meaningless.
Is this thread really neccessary? Don't mean jack **** if he has the worst +/- of the rookies, because he's been playing great the last couple games.
5-1 Rangers win, and he wasn't a plus player
Did you watch the game? Clearly not. What the frick is your point with this comment? I love how so many here love giving him **** for his struggles in the beginning but those same posters don't mention jack **** on what he has done good. He's been great the last 4 games. Give it a rest already lol.
I mean I wanted Kakko to get 100 points this season. So he is disappointing me so far.
It’s a perfectly fine stat when used properly. It’s meaningless as a raw number and has to be looked at in appropriate context.One day people will stop looking at plus/minus, one day...
5-1 Rangers win, and he wasn't a plus player
I am able to focus on more than just one player, thanks though. There is no need to be personal, screams inferiority complex to me.
Kakko is playing horrible, his skating is terribad and his shooting is underwhelming. He is the one dragging his own teammates down, not the other way around. And the stats back that up. Same as Gusev for the Devils but worse.
Kakko is one guy who would benefit a lot if he played in the AHL. Get used to NA ice but actually being able to compete. Same as Rantanen.
"you guys" is a really broad brush to use for all 116,605 other HFBoards users.Oh please you guys have used +/- when it is convinient to **** on Ovechkin. When it's not convinient like when Mario Lemieux gets the exact same bad +/- you say it's meaningless.
Well 2 of the ranger goals were on the power play and one of them was a shorthanded goal (and Kakko obviously wasn't a part of). The last goal was an empty netter so I am not really sure what point you are trying to make here...5-1 Rangers win, and he wasn't a plus player
I have a feeling this will be one of those threads that wont age well
If you can show me proof about how my choice of words don't fit the demographic, I will gladly change it but as far as I know this site has 97-98% men on it."you guys" is a really broad brush to use for all 116,605 other HFBoards users.