phillydownsouth
Giroux is your daddy
- Sep 18, 2019
- 528
- 473
Nope. As long as idiots are on the planet someone will try and argue plus/minusOne day people will stop looking at plus/minus, one day...
+/- is a garbage stat, so who cares?
His xGF% being 31.36% is far more troubling and indicative of struggles so far.
Yes, they have clearly not played well enough.Kreider is only at 33%. Zibanejad is at 37%. They're veterans and yet only marginally better than a rookie. Should we be concerned about them as well?
i was just wondering where the post was that pumped up a habs player for no reason. found it.Suzuki with a +5. The kid is not the most talented of this draft, but he has the highest IQ for sure. He rarely makes mistake, what a smart kid.
when I look at your posts history... it's mostly insults and negativityi was just wondering where the post was that pumped up a habs player for no reason. found it.
Zibanejad has "clearly not played well enough?"Yes, they have clearly not played well enough.
Saying Kakko hasn't played well isn't an indictment on his potential.
But no one is actually highlighting what he's doing wrong.Agreed and I hope that day comes ASAP, but in Kakko’s case, we’ve got far better metrics than +/- and a lot of them suggest that Kakko has actually been one of the very worst players in the NHL this year.
Remember a week ago when people were ****ting on Hughes cause he didnt have a goal in his first week and now he has 7. lol
But no one is actually highlighting what he's doing wrong.
No one is comparing this to other busts as a way to show if it's truly worrying
So it feels like most of the posts are pointless in this thread
I have a theory that almost no one on hf actually knows hockey but everyone wants to LOOK like they know. So they use lazy arguments and stats with zero descriptions of actual play in order to create the appearance of hockey knowledge. fori annegotjink (what the actual **** did my phone do here?) I think it's mostly for an ego boost.
This isn't even directed at you, more the majority of posts in this thread and on hf
https://evolving-hockey.comWhere would someone find those types of stats?
par for the course for this OP tho+/- is a meaningless stat
now you try to imply it means something for a ROOKIE on a SUBPAR TEAM.
pathetic thread
Hughes has 3 G, 4 A = 7 points, and all three of his goals are PP goals.
Kakko has 3 G, 2 A = 5 points, with 1 PP goal.
I'd be careful gloating right now. Hughes is showing obvious skill but he's very much a WIP still.
But here's the thing. If someone said Hughes "has clearly not been playing well enough", yourself and 95% of the Devs board would pitch a fit. Heck, I haven't even made a comment nearly that aggressive and have gotten attacked repeatedly for just suggesting some things he needs to work on.Yes, they have clearly not played well enough.
Saying Kakko hasn't played well isn't an indictment on his potential.
nobody would want him with that +/- statstrade. Immediately