BigVegas17
Registered User
- Mar 4, 2018
- 93
- 112
Rangers having $52M locked up across Panarin, Zib, Kreider, Kadri, Fox, and Trouba for 4+ years is an interesting approach. As a Pens fan, I am all for it
Unless they get a bottom dweller to sign and trade him with 50% retention (is that even legal?), there's no way he signs with the RangersI don't see this. The Rangers simply do not have the cap space. This might be Milstein leaking info to Seravalli to drive the market up.
It will though. Kadri finished top 20 in scoring and PPG out of nowhere and will turn 32 soon. It remains to be seen if the 1st season will be worth it, not to mention whatever comes after that.If he's playing with Panarin I don't expect his production to go down. I just don't see how they squeeze him in unless they are trading Trouba.
Unless they get a bottom dweller to sign and trade him with 50% retention (is that even legal?), there's no way he signs with the Rangers
Yeah, the Rangers are going to lose Lafreniere or Miller to an offer sheet next year if we sign an $8M center.
Which I think the FO would be fine with....as a fan, I'm torn. But if it could keep most of the farm in tact and increase our cup chances, I'd be for it.Yes thats legal and what Brooks suggessted with his column.
However, I cant see a team retaining for the next 4-5 years or however long the contract is, if they do, then it will cost the Rangers a heck of a lot of assets! were talking about multiple 1sts...
The issue is that no one knows how often you are going to see what he did last year, again. If it doesn't then the 8M turns into the Kevin Hayes express all over again.Hmm seems like a good fit actually. 8M seems fair after what he did last season not even considering the fact that he won a Cup.
Dunno why this is being memed on.
Which I think the FO would be fine with....as a fan, I'm torn. But if it could keep most of the farm in tact and increase our cup chances, I'd be for it.
Unless they get a bottom dweller to sign and trade him with 50% retention (is that even legal?), there's no way he signs with the Rangers
He's just what the Rangers need and unfortunately the cost would be high. Depends on what prospects are going the other way, but for now, I'd be fine giving up a a couple 1sts for a potential missing pieceyou'd be fine in giving up multiple 1st round picks and prospects just have Kadri on your team? Really?
If a team ate up a bad salary, let say 4-6 mil for 1 year, whats the history of cost on this? 1st ? 2nd?
So now what you're suggesting is that a team eats 50% of Kadri's 8mil aav for 4-6 years... so roughly eating 4mil a year for the next 4-6 years.
Do you know how many 1sts/2nds and prospects that would cost????????
and again, just to have Kadri on your team...Nazem Kadri...