He certainly doesn't suck,but he most certainly is a product of his team.
Wrong. His individual stats contradict that.
He is a major reason why they won b2b cups. He gave them steady goaltending in the playoffs,something Pittsburgh hasnt had for a long time.
But just like Justin Williams was a major reason why la won in 2014, it didnt make him a top ten player in the league.
The Pens had Fleury playing on the same team, who was and is an established #1 by any standard. And Murray's numbers were significantly better.
Has Justin Williams ever put up stats in the top 2 of all players at his position in the regular season plus playoffs over a 2 year period? Because Murray did between '15-'16 and '16-'17.
Yup. Here we are patting mm on the back for winning games
8-5,
5-0 (such shutout)
5-1,
7-0 (such shutout)
and going back to last season
2-0 (which i admit was a clutch game)
6-0 (such shutout)
4-1
5-3
3-2
7-0 (such shutout)
Meanwhile quick puts on an absolute clinic and doesnt win a game.
But Murray is the reason why the pens score 5+goals a game. He just makes them so damn confident.
52 goals for in his last 10 playoff wins. Money goalie.
He's not a money goalie because of how many goals his team scores. He's a money goalie because of his awesome GAA and SV%. If Quick's individual numbers were as good as Murray's between '15-'16 and '16-'17 I'm sure his team would have won more often, but they weren't. Not even close, actually.
You seem to be confusing Quick's performance last round with overall performance over the last couple years. But you also seem to have a problem processing the whole idea of "sample size" in general, so that shouldn't come as a surprise.
.