Jesse Puljujarvi Possible Breakout Season.

TomasHertlsRooster

Don’t say eye test when you mean points
May 14, 2012
33,360
25,417
Fremont, CA
Well, he's no Sam Bennett, that's for sure.

To a more important point: Has McLellan actually developed anyone who needed it? Vlasic, Burns, Couture didn't need it in San Jose. McDavid, Drai didn't need it. I think all these guys had enough talent to mostly develop themselves and improve upon their games, as was especially the case with Drai coming into camp last prior to last season with an extra step and playing better 200' hockey.

I really don't know, so I'm asking. Is there a compelling of obvious example of a young player whom Todd took from raw talent to a refined NHL impact player? Did he develop Burns maybe more than I give him credit for? He seems too have too much talent to make a case for that, but maybe I'm wrong.

McLellan's best accomplishment in terms of player development might actually be his time with Brent Burns in the AHL when Burns was Wild property. I believe it was McLellan who converted him from forward to defense in the AHL.

However, the majority of Burns' development came under Peter DeBoer. Burns was a 60 point player before DeBoer in his best season with McLellan and has never scored less than 75 under DeBoer although he probably finishes closer to 60 this year.
 

KarmaPolice

Snack enthusiast
Oct 5, 2007
19,132
10,688
In Limbo
McLellan's best accomplishment in terms of player development might actually be his time with Brent Burns in the AHL when Burns was Wild property. I believe it was McLellan who converted him from forward to defense in the AHL.

However, the majority of Burns' development came under Peter DeBoer. Burns was a 60 point player before DeBoer in his best season with McLellan and has never scored less than 75 under DeBoer although he probably finishes closer to 60 this year.

Nice call on his part to convert him to D; I forgot he was a forward first. I guess there's at least a bit of a case to be made there, though could just as easily be dismissed as an outlier, I suppose. That would seem so out of character for him to do something like that these days. I can't even imagine him thinking outside the box like that now. Maybe he's just gotten a lot more stubborn with age, and more rigid in his hockey ideologies.
 

KarmaPolice

Snack enthusiast
Oct 5, 2007
19,132
10,688
In Limbo
If yoU watch him, it's clear he is going to be a player. His hands just need to catch up with his feet.
Perhaps changing that long ass stick to a regular hockey stick would help too.

Yeah, I have watched him, and sometimes I feel he can put it all together and other times he just looks like a mess and I feel less convinced. We'll see, but I'm hoping for the best for the kid (and the Oilers, of course). He's still only 19, and I certainly haven't written him off by any means.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 21 Savage

Emerz

#1 PLD Fanboy
Jun 5, 2013
10,117
9,253
Nova Scotia
I've always wondered why coaches don't put young guys in positions to succeed, as a Bruins fan I'm fortunate that Cassidy loves to give his rookies great positions to play in, tonight Ryan Donato will play his first NHL game and he's going to be on PP1 with Marchand, Pastrnak, Krug, etc.

Same thing with tossing McAvoy on to the top pair for his very first minute of NHL action, he lets the kids run with it and doesn't just bench them or move them down the lineup if they have a poor game or two.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fixxer and Clode

joe dirte

Registered User
Sep 28, 2017
9,430
3,559
I sincerely hope not. He seems like a great kid, always has. I just thought he’d perform better, according to this thread.
this thread was created as a knee jerk reaction to a preseason game. if you're judging him by that, you're going to end up as out to lunch as the OP.
 

ijuka

Registered User
May 14, 2016
22,538
15,214
Yeah this thread was pretty bad at the time.

To be honest, he just never had the hockey IQ and you could see this during his Liiga season and especially during the u-20s when he was playing on the same line as Laine and Aho - The comparison was not pretty at all and at that point it became perfectly evident that his hockey IQ was leagues below both Laine and Aho's. It truly is no surprise at all that he's doing much worse than the other two in NHL.

Not limited to hockey IQ, IQ seems quite low in general which in turn is going to affect many things, very importantly the ability to train and self-improve. The physical genetics are there but I doubt he's ever going to get it fully together.

Of course, for the sake of Finnish hockey I do hope I'm wrong.
 

KarmaPolice

Snack enthusiast
Oct 5, 2007
19,132
10,688
In Limbo
I've always wondered why coaches don't put young guys in positions to succeed, as a Bruins fan I'm fortunate that Cassidy loves to give his rookies great positions to play in, tonight Ryan Donato will play his first NHL game and he's going to be on PP1 with Marchand, Pastrnak, Krug, etc.

Same thing with tossing McAvoy on to the top pair for his very first minute of NHL action, he lets the kids run with it and doesn't just bench them or move them down the lineup if they have a poor game or two.

You're lucky. Our coach would rather put a bust of a player in Rattie on the top line with McDavid and Nuge, instead of giving Jesse a true opportunity to succeed at the moment (and for the rest of the season, IMO), raise his confidence and help him gain traction as a top-6 winger in this league. Also almost no PP time for him. Wouldn't even put Ethan Bear (a young, promising offensive Dman) on a 5-on-3 PP in a meaningless game against Tampa last night. Frustrating.
 
Last edited:

Emerz

#1 PLD Fanboy
Jun 5, 2013
10,117
9,253
Nova Scotia
You're lucky. Our coach would rather put a bust of a player in Rattie on the top line with McDavid and Nuge, instead of giving Jesse a true opportunity to succeed, raise his confidence and help him gain traction as a top-6 winger in this league. Also almost no PP time for him. Wouldn't even put Ethan Bear (a young, promising offensive Dman) on a 5-on-3 PP in a meaningless game against Tampa last night. Frustrating.

Yeah I saw last night and couldn't really believe it, he's gotta give the kids a chance, I mean I'm not saying every single prospect who gets called up should be out on the first PP unit but I know Bear had a great season in the WHL and he's not going to collapse and forget how to play hockey during a 5 on 3.

It's just weird, the kids aren't going to be making a ton more mistakes than a veteran favorite, if they're going to be making mistakes at all. It's not like the Oilers are fighting for playoff positioning, the seasons over and has been for a while, at least give your promising prospects good positions to play in.
 

McDNicks17

Moderator
Jul 1, 2010
41,685
30,146
Ontario
Yeah I saw last night and couldn't really believe it, he's gotta give the kids a chance, I mean I'm not saying every single prospect who gets called up should be out on the first PP unit but I know Bear had a great season in the WHL and he's not going to collapse and forget how to play hockey during a 5 on 3.

It's just weird, the kids aren't going to be making a ton more mistakes than a veteran favorite, if they're going to be making mistakes at all.

The worst part is McLellan preaches stuff like accountability and earning ice time when asked about the young guys, but then trots out the corpses of Lucic and Cammalleri onto the top line and #1 PP unit.
 

Paperbagofglory

Registered User
Nov 15, 2010
5,557
4,730
The worst part is McLellan preaches stuff like accountability and earning ice time when asked about the young guys, but then trots out the corpses of Lucic and Cammalleri onto the top line and #1 PP unit.

I am glad that the coaching staff is trying to develop young 35 year old phenom Mike Cammaleri for his breakout season next year.
 

hirawl

Used Register
Dec 27, 2010
3,315
1,338
He's going to be fine. He just needs to be let loose. Figuratively speaking mostly and as much by himself as the coach.

A fantastic talent and any talks of low hockey IQ is just pure nonsense.
 

TomasHertlsRooster

Don’t say eye test when you mean points
May 14, 2012
33,360
25,417
Fremont, CA
Nice call on his part to convert him to D; I forgot he was a forward first. I guess there's at least a bit of a case to be made there, though could just as easily be dismissed as an outlier, I suppose. That would seem so out of character for him to do something like that these days. I can't even imagine him thinking outside the box like that now. Maybe he's just gotten a lot more stubborn with age, and more rigid in his hockey ideologies.

I'm not sure if it was actually McLellan's decision.

At any rate, I don't think McLellan is great with developing young players. The Sharks are in a playoff spot right now primarily due to an influx of young players who have propelled the Sharks' depth scoring to being some of the best in the NHL. Timo Meier has 19 goals already, Kevin LaBanc has 38 points, and Chris Tierney has 17 goals and 36 points - all this with 10 games left in the season.

Before the season, all 3 of those guys were seen as players who may or may not have had a future in the NHL as regulars on a championship team. Tierney had played a full season over the last 2 years, but had seriously struggled as a 4th line center. LaBanc had played more than half the year last year, but he hit a wall and didn't play a single NHL playoff game. Meier played less than half the season last year and put up some pretty poor numbers.

This year, the Sharks are slightly better than a bubble team and that slight difference is due to them having above average depth scoring from their top-9. All 3 of these players are bonafide top-9 forwards with other great features to their games in addition to their scoring ability. Tierney is the leading forward in PK time on the team with the #1 PK. Meier is on a 30 goal pace in the last ~45 games and is a great possession player and physical beast. LaBanc is also a great possession player and has proven himself to be a very useful asset on the PP.

The Sharks never had this type of player development under Todd McLellan.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KarmaPolice

Slap

Registered User
Sep 28, 2017
875
1,081
Yeah this thread was pretty bad at the time.

To be honest, he just never had the hockey IQ and you could see this during his Liiga season and especially during the u-20s when he was playing on the same line as Laine and Aho - The comparison was not pretty at all and at that point it became perfectly evident that his hockey IQ was leagues below both Laine and Aho's. It truly is no surprise at all that he's doing much worse than the other two in NHL.

Not limited to hockey IQ, IQ seems quite low in general which in turn is going to affect many things, very importantly the ability to train and self-improve. The physical genetics are there but I doubt he's ever going to get it fully together.

Of course, for the sake of Finnish hockey I do hope I'm wrong.
What the actual f***? He was absolutely brilliant in the Liiga playoffs and arguably the best player in that U20 gold winning team.
 

Kelly

Registered User
Nov 12, 2012
14,899
7,479
I'm not sure what's more ridiculous, TWS proclaiming a breakout season after a preseason game, or people calling Puljuj a bust @ 19 years young.
 

CycloneSweep

Registered User
Sep 27, 2017
48,326
40,126
Draisatl had the same development trajectory Pulju is on right now.
Everyone were so worried we were destroying Drai. Same deal with Pulju, watch him next season. Kids his age are very rarely impact players
Uhh...in Drais draft +2 season he had 51 points in 72 games.
 

KarmaPolice

Snack enthusiast
Oct 5, 2007
19,132
10,688
In Limbo
Potentially Yakupov 2.0?

Yakupov is a spaz on skates with 0 hockey IQ. I think everyone can finally agree on that by now.

Jesse looks like he does have a clue where to be at least a lot of the time, so there is definite promise in that regard. Needs better coaching. Maybe should study a lot of Laine tape to see how he finds spots to get open for shots, and how fast he gets those shots off and in what area of the ice, etc. He's a wildcard, but still lots of potential.

If anything, it could be a Paajarvi 2.0. I doubt it, but I think that would be the better possible comparison. Their playing styles are more similar than to Yak, and they weren't 1st overall picks, so less expectations. Though I guess there were definite higher expectations for Pulju than Paajarvi. Eh, whatever.
 

Martin Skoula

Registered User
Oct 18, 2017
11,828
16,671
Even if he has low IQ (could turn it around still), you can still make a less physical Chad Kilger out of him. Too many physical gifts not to be a useful player in the NHL.
 

Puck Dogg

Puck life
Mar 13, 2006
1,812
496
Puljujarvi has shown this season some of the things he can do. With language barrier and all it takes time to adjust. I expect him to be good next season. If not, we can start talkin about not filling potential,
 

oobga

Tier 2 Fan
Aug 1, 2003
23,445
18,663
The kid gloves are fully on with Pulju. McLellan says he scared to even put the pressure of playing on the PP on him.

Not sure what to think about how this kid is being handled anymore.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ippenator

Hatter of the Beach

I’m the real hero
Jun 26, 2017
3,197
3,683
Parkland Estates, Florida
He’ll be fine, and I’m someone who likes bashing on the Oilers. May never be a star, but I see no reason to think he can’t be a good second liner at minimum.

Give him time. Even if he dosen’t have high hockey IQ he is too athletic and has too much skill to bust completely. May turn out to be a bad pick at 4 but can you name even a dozen players who have shown more than him from his draft year? Because I don’t think I can
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad