Look at Puljujarvi, he should have stayed one more year in Finland before making the jump in North America.
Sebastian Aho definately benefited from dominating in Finland before joining the Hurricanes.
Teravainen also took proper time to develop.
Sebastian Aho dominated in Finland, and he's been excellent in the NHL...why would you think had he come to the AHL post-draft that things would of been different?
How have you reached the conclusion that that extra year in his Draft +1yr is why he's so good now?
Puljarvi put up 28pts in 39 AHL games the year after his draft, I don't think his issue was graduating to the AHL following his draft year.
There's no telling how each of their development would of gone had they taken different paths.
Joel Armia was a pretty standout player in Finland in his draft year, he went back another year and had somewhat of a regression, at least statistically. That extra year in Finland didn't help him when he eventually came to North America, he himself said it took him awhile to get adjusted to the North American game in the AHL.
Teemu Pulkkinen had 54pts in 55 games in his draft year, he stayed in Finland 2 more years and his numbers never came close to that again, he eventually came to North America, he's been a dominant player in the AHL but he's still not able to carve himself an NHL spot .
So while you dismiss this "North America acclimatization" as something that doesn't exist...Kotkaniemi himself has talked about this being a very real thing for him.
Every player is different...what was good for Aho, doesn't necessarily mean that's whats good for Kotkaniemi.
Only Kotkaniemi's play should determine where he plays this coming year...not Aho, not Puljarvi, not Pulkkinen, not Armia. If we play the comparison game, we can each come up with 100 names that support each of our stances, so that's pointless.
We have to be careful with the kid and make sure he dominate at one level before making the step to the next level. It's all about progression.
Cases like Laine and Barkov are different because when they played in North America they already showed that they were above the level in Finland.
Yes, we do have to be careful...and I don't think i've said otherwise.
But I also don't think that dominating in Finland is necessarily a precursor to a successful NHL career. There are so many factors at play here and I think you're just focusing on one.