I included Eberle to follow along with the ridiculous logic of letting good players with flaws walk because we can just get perfect players with no flaws so easily.
I'd actually like to see examples of games where KO costs us points. He's a forward ,not a defender. His giveaways are in the same areas as Tavares' giveaways. Usually deep in the offensive zone or up near the opposing teams blue line. JT had a ridiculous play last night where the Sens were breaking out on a 2-1. JT tried to swipe at the puck and stopped skating and missed it and it lead to a 2-1. Fortunately the lone defender played it well and didn't result in a goal, but both are giveaway machines. JT finally scored last night to break out of a funk, but you can't ignore that KO did the same thing last week helping us to key victories.
It's become clear this season that JT needs a number 2. He can't do it on his own. He goes into slumps just like the team does. KO proved he can get us out of slumps by scoring key goals to win games. I think KO is the right guy to have as a number 2. Would I like Stamkos more? Sure, if we get rid of Okposos and replace him with JT i'll do cartwheels. Unfortunately that's the ONLY free agent available that would change my opinion. No to Backes, no to Ladd, no to Staal. Now, if we can procure someone in a trade like others mentioned it will cost hefty assets. So why would we let a guy walk, when it's just money, only to get another guy that costs assets and will also get money? The only way to replace KO logically is through FA signing, there are no FA's worth replacing KO with besides Stamkos (that's putting all our eggs in one basket and I still think a huge crapshoot) and I'm not happy promoting within because we don't have the talent to do that right now. If the Rangers can dump an aging Gomez in a trade we will be able to do the same thing with KO if need be in the future. Just pay the guy, it's the only route that makes sense.