So if I understand you correctly you're saying that Lou wasn't that good with the Devils, but made himself seem better than he is with the fans. Is that correct?
It was rarely clear cut. It is tough, as a fan, to understand what is truly good for the organization, that maybe your best signing is not re-signing a fan favorite, or just signing a #4 defensive defenseman.
Make no mistake in the 90s Lou could do no wrong and was brilliant.
Through the salary cap era however, we watched Niedermayer, Rafalski, Gomez, Holik, Parise and Kovy all walk out the door with no compensation. I'll add Clarkson to that. Our big UFA signings were guys like Volchenkov and it pissed everyone off and is always cause of great debate.
So- was 2012 smoke and mirrors, or did Lou play it all just perfectly? I mean somehow he sends some guys with lead pipes over to the Atlanta Thrashers offices along with some flawed prospects and we walk away with Kovy. Huh?
One thing I'll say: the GM moves may not be perfect - the drafting may be flawed - but with Lou you know the direction of the organization from top to bottom and the effort of the players and coaches isn't to be questioned. Old fashioned, behind the times... what the f*** ever... Look at what the Knights did with just motivation and a bit of talent.
Personally, I think the Isles (and Maple Leafs) are perfect candidates for Lou. Good talent on board rudderless ships.
You got yourself one hell of a rudder, and if the players buy in - look the hell out.