Sens1Canes2
Registered User
- May 13, 2007
- 10,673
- 8,306
Was it Roman Hamrlik? Or was that Yashin's draft year?
This would be a mediocre team even at full health and full production.
Blowing it up isn't the answer, because they're young already. They flat out need to acquire better players,
we don't know what happens in the board room with the owners and all we can do is either believe a guy like Francis or not. was what he did, or what he did not do, part of his plan or because of the result of owner instruction, FA's not wanting to sign, truly not being able to move contracts like Ward, etc., etc..?
whatever the case they took a huge risk on the young guys, the top guys playing career years, new coach, risk of injury, etc., etc., again.
also whatever the case may be, it hasn't worked out so far and although we don't really know all the decisions and choices behind closed doors, we can see the results and speculate on why.
acquiring better players is always something that mitigates risk (and also as importantly, permits more options for play style) but for some reason/s Francis chose not to do so. now at this point it does look like they may end up being sellers if this all continues.
On paper
But really, how do we really know IF we get pick either of them that they don't become Alexandre Diagle 2.0? We don't.
^ I was saying they should have signed better players and the risk was not doing so. I think you just misunderstood my post that's all.
I'm not sure what players they could have signed, they don't have very much cap space and their big contracts are either immovable (Ward, Semin, Liles) or you want to keep (J Staal, to a lesser extent E Staal).
There wasn't any room to do anything, really.
The belief that Francis "chose not to sign better players" is hilarious.
First of all, he signed players that, theoretically, should have filled out the holes in the roster. The biggest issues going into the offseason was the need for a physical presence and depth players. Well, he signed McClement, Malone, and Gleason for less than 4 million (I believe. Don't have their contracts on hand). All three fit the bill of addressing the issues that needed to be addressed. Now, like every signing, there's the risk of it not working out.
Second, as the old saying goes "It takes two to tango." Francis can want to sign "better players" all he'd like, but if those "better players" have no interest in signing here (and no one would blame them), there's not much Francis can do.
we don't know what happens in the board room with the owners and all we can do is either believe a guy like Francis or not. was what he did, or what he did not do, part of his plan or because of the result of owner instruction, FA's not wanting to sign, truly not being able to move contracts like Ward, etc., etc..?
whatever the case they took a huge risk on the young guys, the top guys playing career years, new coach, risk of injury, etc., etc., again.
also whatever the case may be, it hasn't worked out so far and although we don't really know all the decisions and choices behind closed doors, we can see the results and speculate on why.
acquiring better players is always something that mitigates risk (and also as importantly, permits more options for play style) but for some reason/s Francis chose not to do so. now at this point it does look like they may end up being sellers if this all continues.
I'm not sure what players they could have signed, they don't have very much cap space and their big contracts are either immovable (Ward, Semin, Liles) or you want to keep (J Staal, to a lesser extent E Staal).
There wasn't any room to do anything, really.
The belief that Francis "chose not to sign better players" is hilarious.
First of all, he signed players that, theoretically, should have filled out the holes in the roster. The biggest issues going into the offseason was the need for a physical presence and depth players. Well, he signed McClement, Malone, and Gleason for less than 4 million (I believe. Don't have their contracts on hand). All three fit the bill of addressing the issues that needed to be addressed. Now, like every signing, there's the risk of it not working out.
Second, as the old saying goes "It takes two to tango." Francis can want to sign "better players" all he'd like, but if those "better players" have no interest in signing here (and no one would blame them), there's not much Francis can do.
Try explaining that to ^^^
They have/had a couple million in cap space they just chose not to use it. For all intents and purposes their budget is pretty much the cap though, so it's not really any different. But you can't really lay that at the feet of Francis. If he's not allowed to spend he can't do anything. You can't lay it at the feet of PK either. He's already losing a bunch of money and still holds most of the financial burden. You can't even lay it at the feet of the fans. Tickets aren't exactly a scarce resource when the team isn't winning, and no one wants to commit themselves to 26-41 nights of letdown. It's just a perfect system of checks and balances right now.
That said, c'mon BB let's not even pretend like the moves he did make "Should have filled out the holes". The problems from last year remain. They're missing another top four defenseman. They have, at best, 6-7 top nine forwards, and that's only because guys like Nash and Rask gave blown apart everyone's expectations.
I'm not so sure the guys they did sign are any different than the guys they replaced: Mcclement is Malhotra, Malone is Westgarth, Bellemore is Bellemore. Gleason is really the only "addition".
If there's one move they *need* to make, it's finding another useful defenseman. Combine that with the return of Jordan in January, and suddenly this team looks a whole lot better.
Anyway, yeah, I know moves are a two-way street, but for free agents, I think having to "bribe" someone to play here is overblown. For a guy like Parise or Suter, sure, but most player just want to play. It can be a tiebreaker, but I doubt there's a big, flashing "NO CAROLINA" sign in every agents' office.
The explanation could just as easily be that they never wanted to shell out money in the first place. I'm sure its not exactly high on anyone's list but I can't imagine the premium is more than a couple hundred K
Well, the general consensus for most players is they either play for the money or play for the championship. Carolina hasn't been able to offer the chance at either of those in a long, long time. So what exactly does the organization have to offer free agents? Raleigh's a nice place to live and raise a family?
Just remember, no one remembers who is picked #2
TBH that might be the main selling point right now.
The only other thing I can think of is that Francis/Brindy/Wesley/Nieuwendyk/Stillman/Smith probably have a fair amount of cred among the players. Especially for guys of an age to have grown up watching them.