I think it's the -3 of the 2-3 year deal that we are hearing that everyone is concerned with and rightfully so, but If this somehow doesn't work out, he is probably going to be a valuable trade chip......we somehow need to have him signed to a 3rd year "optional" for the team and meet him in the middle with a limited amount of teams he would accept.
Thing is.......am I right in saying that he "just" wants to play for the Rangers? Help me out here guys. Thanks.
Using deduction as well as his and his agent’s public statements there are 3 main motivations in no particular order
1. Ability to compete for SC
2. Financial stability / certainty
3. Closeness (tri-state) to his house in the area
The question is what would be his priorities if he’s unable to find a suitor who’d be able to perfectly satisfy all three.
From this perspective the Rangers clearly fit the 3rd motivation, and likely to to offer a contract size to his satisfaction but only on a two year term. Then the question is how valuable to him to have another year on his contract and the fact that there are teams that are more likely to be contenders during this period.