Or maybe you should stalk professional athletes in private instead of publically. Or maybe take up yahtzee? Or maybe get out a little and try to find the man of your dreams?
It's the middle of summer...chill.
Of course Nuke has the 5S.
Get out of your mom's basement and off your cell phones and go get laid. God damn kids and your rap music and hipster clothes. (am i doing this right?)
Of course Nuke has the 5S.
Alright sorry to be the spoil-sport. Moved most of the recent conversation over to the OT thread. Let's keep this one (somewhat) pertaining to that beautiful Ruskie we call Nuke.
So? It was for what, 20-30 games? Spezza is a very good player, and should be able to mesh with a lot of the players we have. I'd rather set the line up with the best fits, and see how we go from there. I would much rather a playmaking winger play with Benn and Seguin. They can both create, but IMO they are both predominantly goal scorers, so having an off wing who looks to get them the puck first will max out those strengths. I think Hemsky could mesh just as well with the top line as he did in that short period with Spezza.Maybe, but we know for a fact that Spezza and Hemsky have pre-established chemistry, I can see them using that instead.
Or maybe you should stalk professional athletes in private instead of publically. Or maybe take up yahtzee? Or maybe get out a little and try to find the man of your dreams?
So? It was for what, 20-30 games? Spezza is a very good player, and should be able to mesh with a lot of the players we have. I'd rather set the line up with the best fits, and see how we go from there. I would much rather a playmaking winger play with Benn and Seguin. They can both create, but IMO they are both predominantly goal scorers, so having an off wing who looks to get them the puck first will max out those strengths. I think Hemsky could mesh just as well with the top line as he did in that short period with Spezza.
And Nuke simply looked to defer too much to Benn and Seguin last season, to the detriment of his game. It was his rookie season and you expect his confidence to grow his sophomore year, but Spezza is still a better fit for him IMO, as Nuke is a goal scorer, who basically doesn't shoot enough. Playing with a true playmaker like Spezza is a better fit for him.
Hemsky may play with Benn and Seguin at some point. Hell, Benn and Seguin don't have to be completely joined at the hip now either. Benn with Spezza and Hemsky with Seguin from time to time could work great. In the ebbs and flows of a season there's no hard in experimenting some, but at the beginning of the season I don't see the point in trying to be too cute. You need to start the season off strong and if you've got two sets of pairs up front it's way better than having one dominant line and a second line with an awesome center trying to find chemistry with completely new wingers.
Personally, I'd like to see Nichushkin on the left of Spezza and Hemsky, that way he's playing with two playmakers. You can put pretty much anybody up with Benn and Seguin without hurting them.
Nill said it in Spezza's press conference. I don't think that line needs a gritty guy whatsoever. Not every line has to have a pure banger on it to succeed. Put a high level passer with Seguin and Benn and they could both pot around 40 a piece.I don't agree at all that Benn/Seguin need a playmaker and if that's what Nill thinks then I disagree with him. They need a crasher/grinder/gritty guy with finishing ability.
Benn does enough of that. They aren't passing focused, like Spezza and Hemsky are. Our puck possession is just fine last I checked, and should only be better next season. And it seems like the coaching staff and FO don't think they need a banger on their line either, or Nill wouldn't have specified that as the primary reason for going after Hemsky in the first place.Benn and Seguin are the high level passers. Their line needs someone focused on forechecking, and recovering and maintaining possession.