1993/2017 Chicago had the best record in their conference, but also got swept (0-4 by STL and NSH, respectively).
1971 Bruins, 1990 Flames, 1986 Flyers, 1994 Red Wings, 2006 Red Wings, 1991 Blackhawks, 2012 Canucks, 2003 Red Wings.
TB is in their company. How does this compare and contrast with these other teams that had similar flameouts in the FIRST ROUND (albeit not sweeps)
(HINT: for better answers to this question, you should post it on the History Forum.)
Well, Chicago in 1993 was pretty darn bad. 1st overall, and they had a strong team with 3 Hall of Famers (possibly two more to come), and they'd been to the Finals the year before. They were swept by the Brett Hull Blues, which were barely a .500 team that year. However, at least you can point to the Blackhawks' lack of offence as a clear achilles' heel all that season, and indeed they failed to score at all in two of the four games lost. So, I think Tampa's incredible offence and well above-average defence makes them a stronger seed than Chicago in '93, though this one was pretty darn bad.
2017 Chicago was "only" third overall, and they lost to a good Nashville team that ended up two wins shy of the Stanley Cup. So, definitely Tampa '19 is worse than that.
The 1971 Bruins hugely disappointed (sandwiched between two Cups), but they lost to a .622 Montreal team that went on to win the Cup and had 10 Hall of Famers. So, not even close to Tampa in 2019.
The 1990 Flames had already dropped 18 points from the previous (Cup) season, and had lost three of their key team leaders/veterans. They had a poor coach (Terry Crisp) who'd lost the players before the playoffs started, and they faced the high-scoring Gretzky Kings (who would be a 1st place team the next season). Calgary was undone by a game three overtime loss, followed by a game four that was perhaps the most embarrassing loss any defending Cup champ has ever suffered (presumably after a night partying in Hollywood). This was a bad flop, and
is kind of comparable to Tampa this year. Tampa this year was much more dominant, but Calgary in '90 were super deep in good players and were defending Cup champs. At least Calgary went six games, but the way they lost game four was utterly humiliating, so I'll call this a tie with Tampa.
1986 Philly was also really bad. A great team in that era, they lost in 5 games (it was best out of three for the final time in '86) to a sub-.500 Rangers squad. In fairness, the Rangers then took down another really good team (Washington) before running into Patrick Roy, so at least they were really "on" in spring '86. I think I'd say Tampa '19 is slightly worse because Philly was still a young team, and their embarrassing loss was sandwiched between Cup Final appearances.
Detroit in 1994 is not as bad as Tampa this year. San Jose had gone 8-2-1 to close the season and were peaking, and finished "only" 18 points behind Detroit, which was 4th overall that season.
The 2006 Wings are a tough one to compare. With a .756 season, they were almost as dominant as Tampa this year, and on paper they should have beaten Edmonton with room to spare. But since mid-December, the Oilers had gone 35-17-9 and been one of the League's top teams. They had Chris Pronger and eventually went to the seventh game of the Finals. So, I don't think was as bad as Tampa this year (though the jury is still out on how good Columbus really is this season, I guess).
The 1991 Blackhawks are not as bad as Tampa. They did have a great season, but it was their first great season in a long time, and they weren't established yet as a top team. They lost to Minnesota in six, so they were not swept. And furthermore, Minnesota was one of those "teams of destiny" in 1991 that just cut other teams down (like Edmonton in 2006). They also took down 2nd overall St.Louis and the defending champs Edmonton, and challenged Cup champ Pittsburgh.
The 2012 Canucks, I'm not really sure. (I was actually living in Van in late 2011, but I left the country in early 2012 and missed out completely on what happened after that.) But even though they had another good season, my feeling is that most hockey observers thought they had kind of shot their wad in 2011. People weren't as impressed by them in 2012. More to the point, though, they lost to the Cup champion (L.A.), so unless Columbus wins the Cup this year, that automatically means Tampa's situation is worse.
The 2003 Red Wings are maybe a closer comparable, but, again, they weren't as dominant as Tampa and they lost to a really good team that almost won the Cup. Tampa's situation this year is worse.
******
So, in conclusion, I'm going to say that the following three are in a similar ballpark to Tampa in 2019:
1) 1986 Philly (swept by the Rangers)
2) 1990 Calgary (lost in six to L.A.)
3) 1993 Chicago (swept by St.Louis)
And the worst of those three is probably Calgary in 1990, but Calgary was 2nd overall (not 1st) and they lost in six (weren't swept). Also, Calgary (1st NHL in offence) lost to the team with the 2nd best offence, which hardly seems like Tampa's case this year.
So, I think Tampa's 2019 case is indeed possibly the worst first-round flop by a team with a monster RS record. What makes it even worse (to me), is that the team's captain, Steve Stamkos, was minus 8 in the series. As Tampa allowed only 14 ES/SH goals against (and Stamkos got a 'plus' in game four), that means Stamkos was on the ice for
at least 9 of those 14 goals against (possibly more). That is... bad.