You are either A) delusional, B) didn't watch either game, or C) trolling.
They didn't lose two games in a row, then haven't even been in either game. They haven't even competed for points yet.
I don't know enough about MacKinnon and Jones, but if the Canes get the number 1 pick, you take BPA with that pick, not fill a need IMO. If the consensus is that MacKinnon is the best, you choose him. Look back in time.
Would you rather have Taveres or Hedmen?
Would you rather have Stamkos or Doughty (although this is closer, I'd still take Stamkos any day)
Would you rather have Nugent-Hopkins, Landeskog, or Larrsson?
Would you rather have Sequin/Hall..or Gundbrandson?
The only time in the last 15 years that a defenseman has been chosen #1 was Erik Johnson. While Johnson is a fine defenseman, I'd argue that J. Staal, Backstrom, Towes, and even Kessel have had more accomplished careers.
But I agree with totalkev, this team won't get a #1 or #2 pick. Even if they stink it up to start, they'll turn it around enough to get a 7-12 pick.
I don't know enough about MacKinnon and Jones, but if the Canes get the number 1 pick, you take BPA with that pick, not fill a need IMO. If the consensus is that MacKinnon is the best, you choose him. Look back in time.
Would you rather have Taveres or Hedmen?
Would you rather have Stamkos or Doughty (although this is closer, I'd still take Stamkos any day)
Would you rather have Nugent-Hopkins, Landeskog, or Larrsson?
Would you rather have Sequin/Hall..or Gundbrandson?
The only time in the last 15 years that a defenseman has been chosen #1 was Erik Johnson. While Johnson is a fine defenseman, I'd argue that J. Staal, Backstrom, Towes, and even Kessel have had more accomplished careers.
But I agree with totalkev, this team won't get a #1 or #2 pick. Even if they stink it up to start, they'll turn it around enough to get a 7-12 pick.
One thing that JR deserves credit for is explicitly saying that he doesn't like taking defensemen high. It really seems like 90% of the time you ought to use the first round pick on a forward.
You know, unless you'd like to have a Drew Doughty on your team. He's pretty good.
2 games and we're already talking about McKinnon and Jones. Yep, pretty much unvistable here.
One thing that JR deserves credit for is explicitly saying that he doesn't like taking defensemen high. It really seems like 90% of the time you ought to use the first round pick on a forward.
Not to mention Jack Johnson! Or Thomas Hickey! Or Cam Barker!
Ward's been bad for 2 games, and our shots haven't gone in for 2 games. = losing.
I don't know if I'd go that far. I do think it's harder to judge some of these defensemen, how long it will take for them to develop, etc....but, there are a lot of outstanding (or at least very good) defensemen chosen in the 1st round. Suter, Doughty, Pietrangelo, Burns, Seabrook, Phaneuf, Marc Staal, Alzner, McDonaugh, Karlsson, etc..
My only point was that if you have a top pick, you pick BPA and not for need.
Anyhow, it's kind of irrelevant...as I expect them to turn it around at somepoint. The question is how long will it take for them to gain the chemistry and shake off the rust.
Our defense has been awful, Ward not much better and the offense has missed on some golden chances but their chances are outnumberd 5 to 1 with the other team.
sure its a small sample size but this team doesn't have long to turn it around. It's not a team that can have an off night and still win.
Four teams at the bottom of the East:
Canes
Caps
Rangers
Flyers
Along with LA still not having a win, I think we should wait a little before considering this season a failure.
As to why we can't finish...there isn't a reason. It's just puck luck. "Finishing chances" isn't an actual athletic skill, it's just that a shot that has a chance to go in also has a chance to not go in. Sometimes there are runs of bad luck.
While I don't disagree, I also think there is more than luck to our 4% shooting. We're not making life difficult on opposing goaltenders primarily because the forwards are not doing the dirty work to score on deflections and rebounds. Semin failing to shoot the puck at an open net is an athletic failure, as is shooting it along the ice at a sprawled-out goalie.
Like everyone else, our forwards need to be better. Jokinen in particular has been awful, Skinner has been only so-so, Eric Staal has not stepped up the way we had hoped he would. Missing Ruutu hurts more than some would like to admit. There are a lot of individual issues feeding into the lack of goal scoring, above and beyond the bad puck luck they are experiencing.
The organizational blind spot for defense strikes again. You guys can micro-analyze all you want, but at the end of the day, we have one top four d-man -- and he's 20 years old.
Tim Gleason is no better than Jay Harrison. Sanguinetti and Corvo have no business in the league. And Joni Pitkanen is maddeningly frustrating, having all the skills but seemingly no idea what to do with them. The combined hockey sense of the five of them barely approaches Faulk's.
Our guys get forechecked so easily, get pushed around like ragdolls, and even if they don't lose the puck, their first pass is so bad than we lose all momentum.
I've come to the conclusion that we're just not going back to the playoffs until the defense is overhauled, and it's just not my job to solve the problem.
So what has JRs strategy of not drafting defenseman netted him? Faulk and dick. The defense is a trainwreck with 1 hurricanes draft pick in the entire unit. I don't think that's something he should be congratulated for.
Glad you guys had a good experience. One thing I honestly like about our fans (or at least the ones inside the arena) is that they can be passionate without being outright hostile.
Anybody see the Lightning fans in 312 who got kicked out 5 minutes into the game? I wonder what happened there?