Originally Posted by BubbaBoot
Bob Pulford
first 2 years at LW
next 5 years at CTR - 3 all-star games - 2 Cups - 2 of his highest 3 goal scoring marks - 2nd highest pts.
next 9 yrs at LW - 2 all-star games - 2 Cups - his 2 highest assists mark - highest pt total.
I read Punch Imlach followed the Canadiens model and was notorious for mixing lines and positions.
Wow, I thought Pulford played more C than that. That would make him look like a LW first and foremost. Is this information in your profile?
I used the Hockey-Reference player index/season finder while I was compiling VsX numbers for my assassination. It seems to be the most easiest and complete of all the stat sheets to use. As I am not a wiz with Excel, it is a very labourious process.
Pulford may have played more at CTR but because of his versatility could very easily been bounced around a lot. This is not definitive but appears LW was where he spent the bulk of his career, (appx. 2/3's). H-Ref is not infallible but there is no way for sure, outside of spending way to much time in hunting down news reports and box scores of his 16 year career. (Participating in this thread was a diversion for me, but now has turned into an unhealthy obsession...I have only so much time).
Again, Imlach was his coach for a long spell and while he probably had a set starting position, he also was slotted in wherever he was needed as a shadow against the opposition's top forwards.
I don't have this info on the bio but I'll probably add it soon enough....as with all my multi-positional players, I want to feature his versatile aspects. It is a big criteria for my drafting strategy.
Originally Posted by BubbaBoot
Dany Heatley
Spent at least 2 full years at LW. He had his highest VsX goal scoring numbers in one of those years.
QPQ made a pretty compelling case to have Heatley as a RW first if we had to pick one. ]
Like Pulford it appears Heatley spent some time, but not nearly as many years, on the off-wing for a decent stretch and had some excellent years. Much like Delvecchio with Howe and currently Marleau (which according to left-wing.com,is a drafted CTR playing mostly on LW) with Thornton, he was placed there to stack the top line. It's probably appx. 4 yrs at LW with 6+ yrs on the RW. Again, I was using the H-Ref tool when I noticed him not listed on the top RW goal scorers on a year and I checked and found he is listed as a LW for a few of those years.... they were some of his most productive years.
Originally Posted by BubbaBoot
Brian Rolston
Drafted as a CTR. Probably spent equal amounts of time at both LW and CTR. He did have significant time on RW, but not more than the other two positions. He is as close to an full-blown F that you could come to.
He's a legit all-position guy. Usually played LW for the Devils. Still, I think he was usually C in Boston where he got most of his Selke votes though right? Seems like he was at his best then.
He played mostly at CTR with Bruins but had very significant time on the LW and a bit on the right wing. He's listed as a LW and CTR. His very brief second go-around he was exclusively LW on the third line as well as PK duties and PP point.
He had three 30+ goal seasons in a row with the Minnesota Wild where he played mostly CTR.
In one of my bio photos of him you can see him carrying the puck down the right wing in a Bruins uniform and if I'm not mistaken I once saw in the Google photo gallery, a hockey trading card that listed him as RW. He also played the right PP point and that's where I have him on the 1st unit.
Originally Posted by BubbaBoot
Jimmy Roberts
Spent significant time at both RW and DEF, often mixing it not only in a season but in a game.
In the unlikely event someone includes him, RW is his main forward position.
I have him as my 3rd pairing right d-man(#6).
He is listed in Hockey-Reference as D/RW.
He played both DEF and RW for significant stretches, entire seasons even, for both the Canadiens and the Blues. He was known as "the ultimate utility-man' because he was very good at both positions and as was the norm with coaches Toe Blake and Scotty Bowman, he was bounced around and used accordingly for the situation at hand.
I debated long and hard over this one. I needed a quality right-handed #6 and the tipping point was he was also equally as good at the RW as a shadow and a PKer at either position, depending on the situation at hand; emergency or shadowing purposes.
I felt he was the BPA for where I wanted him and for his tool box.
I feel he is a legit D/RW.
Originally Posted by BubbaBoot
Reggie Fleming
Is another F/D but I think it's tipped mostly at LW, although I have read some reports of him occasionally playing RW.
I think it was mostly LW too.
You're right, he is....but in Hockey-Reference he is listed as a D/LW.
For his Chicago days he's listed as W/D. In Boston he's listed as LW.With NYR he's listed as LW, as he was with BUF and PHILLY. His WHA days has no position listed but one would have to assume he was exclusively a LWer.
It's good to know he was a defenseman at one point. He's a left-hand shot and my other spare defenseman, Al Shields, was a right hand shot and I saw no indication that he played anything other than the right side.
Besides Flemings punching/instigating prowess,where he could be slotted into the line-up versus other rough and tumble opponents, him having played the blue line and being used in a pinch there was another reason why I picked him.
Originally Posted by BubbaBoot
Dave Poulin
Drafted as a CTR, but played significant time at LW also....
Tom Lysiak
Drafted as a CTR but also played LW and sometimes RW....I think it's probably something like 25%-65%-10% for him.
I don't think C for those guys is debatable.
You're right. But it's good to know that they can play anywhere on the ice and be comfortable. With Lysiak it was stated that he played the PP as a shooter and passer and also on the point, so there's no question that he has the skill level to play anywhere in the offensive zone.
Both of these guys were good at ES, Lysiak more so, but I wanted Poulin more for his PK and leadership abilities....that I was able to recreate his most productive years with his PHILLY linemates Propp and Kerr is a plus for me because I don;t have to use conjecture in deciding matching qualities with his linemates, it's already a known entity.
Originally Posted by BubbaBoot
Leo Labine
Played mostly on RW but had decent spells on the LW too.
Seems like a RW
True. Besides his fighting/instigating skills, and occasional forays to the LW, I found out that he was also a quality PKer and his most productive goal scoring years were a result of him being on the Bruins PP unit.....it made him even more desirable in my eyes.
________
With my subs, in case of injury or suspension or game misconduct, I have a lot of versatility.
- at LW - Fleming can go up and/or my current bottom line CTR can move over and/or I bring up Shuvalov.
- at CTR - One of my 3 bottom LWers can move over and/or I bring up Shuvalov.
- at RW - Roberts can move up from R DEF and I can slot in Shields. Rolston can be used effectively in a game situation pinch.
- at L DEF - I can slot in Fleming.
- at R DEF - I can slot in Shields.
There is a method to my madness.
_________
Also note:
About Ralph Backstrom.....I read in an old newspaper article / feature just after his junior years, (where he was considered to be one of THE best juniors of the year), in which he pretty much was used at every positon except goal and played big minutes and given a lot of latitude around the ice, (ie...."give Backstrom the puck and let him do his thing" was probably the mantra)....probably a big factor in him becoming a better all-around player.