Evilo said:I still stand by what I said the last time when Crosby was ranked first : they should be tied.
There's really no way to tell who's going to be better in 10 years between Ovechkin and Sid.
champben2002 said:I don't see how Ovechkin beats out Crosby. This is about prospects right? Crosby is nearly 2 years younger than Ovechkin and has only 4 points less than him at this point in the season.
Also, Meszaros and Prucha are quite low for their performances in the NHL.
KING ELVI said:The whole top 50 will change a lot this next season with most playing in 65+ nhl games by the end of this season. The list looks like a best young nhl players list imo.
You are correct, it doesn't make any sense,only at HF.champben2002 said:I don't see how Ovechkin beats out Crosby. This is about prospects right? Crosby is nearly 2 years younger than Ovechkin and has only 4 points less than him at this point in the season.
Also, Meszaros and Prucha are quite low for their performances in the NHL.
Le Golie said:Toivonen is not near those two.
Quiet Robert said:Wasen't Ovechkin drafted in 2004??????
ROFLcopter!11!! hahahah pwns u n00bz!1111!!!
champben2002 said:I don't see how Ovechkin beats out Crosby. This is about prospects right? Crosby is nearly 2 years younger than Ovechkin and has only 4 points less than him at this point in the season.
Also, Meszaros and Prucha are quite low for their performances in the NHL.
sec17 said:This marks the exact moment when it stopped being funny.
RallyKiller said:remember all the talk earlier of AO not getting assists? well he's not too far behind the wonderboy now.
kingpest19 said:Easy Ovechkin has put up better numbers. Both are first year nhl players. Ovechkin has also put up better numbers in less games
kingpest19 said:Easy Ovechkin has put up better numbers. Both are first year nhl players. Ovechkin has also put up better numbers in less games
monster_bertuzzi said:It can be argued - in fact theres no arguement, Crosby plays with more talented players too.
champben2002 said:So? He is 2 yrs older. We can only hope that Crosby will improve over the next 2 years. And if he improves, he will be massacre Ovechkin's stats as 20. If you are talking prospects than potential counts and right now Crosby has more potential.
champben2002 said:So? He is 2 yrs older. We can only hope that Crosby will improve over the next 2 years. And if he improves, he will be massacre Ovechkin's stats as 20. If you are talking prospects than potential counts and right now Crosby has more potential.
Joe Thornton #1 Fan said:I think Lehtonen and Lundqvist get too much love...Toivonen has looked just as capable while being a year younger than Lehtonen and 2 years younger than Lundqvist.
Thoughts? or am I just Bruins-biased?
because Vanek is going to be a machineStealingSociety said:BTW why is Vanek that much higher than Svatos and Prucha, if it was me I'd put him behind the other 2, but even if not, why is he 6 spots higher than Svatos and 17 than Prucha. That's a joke.