Hockey's Future Top 50 Prospects Spring 2006: 1-10

[Holly Gunning]

http://www.hockeysfuture.com/article.php?sid=8353&mode=threaded&order=0

Click to read more...

 

[The Mars Volchenkov]

Good work, can't really argue with the top 10.

 

[Bank Shot]

Pfft! Ovechkin should be rated higher then one.

 

[AnThGrt]

Pfft! Ovechkin should be rated higher then one.

Agreed

 

[Abyss]

good list, good too see Carter at #9 even if he isn't putting up huge numbers

 

[speeds]

minor error:

Ovechkin was drafted in 04, not 03.

 

[monster_bertuzzi]

One disagreement I have is Johnson over Suter.

 

[ChemiseBleuHonnete]

''You cannot get more natural abilities from a hockey player than Washington’s charismatic first rounder in 2003''

he was drafted in 2004

 

[Thirty One]

I don't like Lehtonen over Lundqvist, but hey, not my list

p.s. I think Ovechkin was drafted in 04

 

[Skroob*]

good list,

but let me be the first to point out that Ovechkin was drafted in 04, not 03.

 

[Jim Carey Price]

I think Lehtonen and Lundqvist get too much love...Toivonen has looked just as capable while being a year younger than Lehtonen and 2 years younger than Lundqvist.

Thoughts? or am I just Bruins-biased?

 

[Abyss]

I think Lehtonen and Lundqvist get too much love...Toivonen has looked just as capable while being a year younger than Lehtonen and 2 years younger than Lundqvist.

Thoughts? or am I just Bruins-biased?

Ehh...I think all 3 are great. Only problem i had was Ward being higher then Toivonen.

 

[Le Golie]

I think Lehtonen and Lundqvist get too much love...Toivonen has looked just as capable while being a year younger than Lehtonen and 2 years younger than Lundqvist.

Thoughts? or am I just Bruins-biased?

Toivonen is not near those two.

 

[Wally112pac]

Toivonen is not near those two.

Correct.

He's a hair behind and younger.

 

[Chartrand]

I like it. Small little error in there though...


Ovechkin was drafted in 2004, not 2003. Surprised nobody picked up on that.

 

[Abyss]

Ovechkin was drafted in 2004, not 2003. Surprised nobody picked up on that.

lol

 

[Took a pill in Sbisa]

There you have it.

Ovechkin>Crosby.

Game. Match. Point.

Oh however the hell it goes

 

[Metallian*]

once again, HF shows bias towards Crosby

 

[SwOOsh*]

and another thing showing/stating that Ovechkin > Crosby.

 

[monster_bertuzzi]

but let me be the first to point out that Ovechkin was drafted in 04, not 03.

I think you're about #4 actually.

 

[ReLyT]

hey,
I think Ovechkin was drafted in '04 instead of '03

 

[EroCaps]

It looks like wealthmanager will be leaving us.

What a shame.

 

[Rico Fatastic]

and another thing showing/stating that Ovechkin > Crosby.

It's all good. Even the best of us get 'em wrong once in a while.

 

[Jaded-Fan]

You all are getting awfully excited over the 1 and 2 thing. I happen to agree with it actually. They had to pick someone and why not the guy with the slight edge right now? I think that they could have gone either way and been right on this one though. Did you all miss this part? 'slight edge over Sidney Crosby, though there is very little separating the two in terms of potential.' About a tie from what I see as well. Apparently HF felt the same, and this would have been exactly how I would have voted if I had a vote.

 

[King'sPawn]

Wasn't Ovechkin drafted in '04? I didn't see it anywhere in this thread.