Stich - I'm not getting your redundant argument. First of all, scouts that I talked to before the 2004 draft liked Montoya more than Schwarz. I only spoke to four, but there was a consensus among them that Montoya was the better prospect. This belief was confirmed when 10 teams passed on Schwarz AFTER NY grabbed Montoya. Talk about pre-draft lists all you want; the proof was in the pudding.
As was stated (but seemingly ignored) by an insightful poster earlier in this thread, there are more than 1000 prospects from several drafts and free agency that are considered for the top 50 list.
Let's say the average NHL scout had Montoya 7th on their lists and Schwarz 14th. You should also consider the prospects from previous drafts (including top ten picks) that have yet to crack the NHL. There is going to be more than a 7-player spread between the two players when every prospect is considered.
HF rankings are pretty well bang on - he should be about 20 spots lower than Montoya, and his play thus far in the WHL has done nothing to refute that ranking. If anything; Scwharz looks like the goalie that was overhyped, despite waht i've read from several here saying the same thing about Montoya.
Until I see some clutch goaltending from Schwarz I refuse to see what all the fuss is about. Jamie Storr was a great reflex goalie as well, but if you can't handle the pressure, you're not going to be a great NHLer no matter how quick your glove hand is. I know I wasn't overly impressed with Schwarz's play at the last WJC when he flubbed a long shot that essentially demoralized his team. It wouldn't be the first time the Blues made an error in judging a goalie's talent either - not exactly a long list of drafted/developed goalies on the ol' resume.
As for those wondering why their borderline top 50 prospects didn't make it; consider this - At least ten teams had one or less prospects on that list. Many team's second best prospect didn't make it.
Take an honest look at the players ranked ahead of your "slighted" prospects, and ask yourself why they might be considered to be better. I think that the anger will perhaps subside after looking at the list keeping in mind that every team has good prospects. There are 30 teams to choose from, lest we forget.
And oh yeah; Leafaholix - always amusing to see you comment on how some homers overhype their own prospects, yet you declare two of your own (Coco and Steen) to be the least appreciated (along with the top prospect in the world). Alwaysa good for a laugh. P.S. If Coco becomes a better NHLer than Higgins (the "disgrace" of the top 50); I'll eat a Leafs cap.