- Aug 24, 2011
- 27,741
- 12,347
"You don't agree with me so you're not objective."
There are very few teams' #4 defenseman whom I would swap with Oduya; and there are some teams in the league whom I wouldn't trade Oduya for their #3 defenseman.
The expectations by some posters are ridiculous. Oduya is a #4 defenseman! That means if he ranks somewhere between 91-120 out of the 180 dressing defensemen in the NHL he is living up to his positional status. I don't see how Oduya does not meet, if not exceed, that criteria.
IF standing in front of the net clueless (while the other team scores) and giving away the puck on a regular basis qualifies for a #4 line Dman. Oduya qualifies.
Watch the other #4 defensemen around the league, they make mistakes much more often than Oduya. #4 defensemen are by definition, below average.
IF standing in front of the net clueless (while the other team scores) and giving away the puck on a regular basis qualifies for a #4 line Dman. Oduya qualifies.
You just saw one of them on clip on the KHayes thread you were just on...and he's on a really good Boston team.Name some.....
You just saw one of them on clip on the KHayes thread you were just on...and he's on a really good Boston team.
First you have to find teams that actually have 3 through 6 kind-of sorted, that's a small list. Then you're left with guys like:
Quincey
B. Stuart
Robidas
Scandella
Stralman
etc.
Doesn't look like a long list to me.
Doesn't look like a long list to me.
You just saw one of them on clip on the KHayes thread you were just on...and he's on a really good Boston team.
First you have to find teams that actually have 3 through 6 kind-of sorted, that's a small list. Then you're left with guys like:
Quincey
B. Stuart
Robidas
Scandella
Stralman
etc.
I didn't think I should wasting time listing all the teams that can't figure out who to make as their 2nd pair or number 4 including playoff teams like CLB, TB, Pit, and Colorado. Is he better or worse than LA's or STL's number 4 going into 2015 btw?
You said list some.
Here are some more:
Smith
Meszaros
Gleason
Smid
Benn
What would be a much more fun exercise would be you naming 120 defensemen better than him.
I think a better exercise to see who could Kool-Aid Oduya more as a good #4 D-man.
I've hardly been the biggest Oduya fan and I think Hammer carries most of that pairing's weight.
But seriously? Oduya is capable of playing #4 minutes on a Stanley Cup winning team. You know why I think that? Because he did. And he came a goal away from having a very good chance of doing it in back to back years.
This whole notion that he doesn't have much value has sprung up out of nowhere and it's laughable. Guys who can log second pairing minutes adequately get paid a ton as UFA's because teams need them. Did you see what Orpik just got paid?
I disagree and I'm very curious about that.Don't waste your time. You will find that over 2/3 of the teams don't have a #4 D that is as bad or/and more overpaid than Oduya.
I've hardly been the biggest Oduya fan and I think Hammer carries most of that pairing's weight.
But seriously? Oduya is capable of playing #4 minutes on a Stanley Cup winning team. You know why I think that? Because he did. And he came a goal away from having a very good chance of doing it in back to back years
Noel, Quenneville, B. Sutter, Lemaire, Anderson, and Ramsay ALL thought he was good enough for top 4 minutes.Just because Oduya logs minutes as a #4 D-Man does NOT make him capable.
I don't think you know what facts are.