Next game I would do:
Drouin - Suzuki - Anderson
Tatar - Danault - Gallagher
Lehkonen - KK - Toffoli
Byron - Evans - Armia
Chiarot - Weber
Romanov - Petry
Mete - Edmundson
By game 10 I expect Romanov will be next to Petry, then up w Weber by game 40 as long as the wheels don’t fall off.Next game I would do:
Drouin - Suzuki - Anderson
Tatar - Danault - Gallagher
Lehkonen - KK - Toffoli
Byron - Evans - Armia
Chiarot - Weber
Romanov - Petry
Mete - Edmundson
That forward group was my starting lineup for this year when the offseason was declared 'over'.
Never knew Romanov would force his way up this quickly... it will be interesting to see if they want Romanov on the 2nd pairing sooner than later.
As for Mete coming in, I think the Julien Way is to give Edmundson the benefit of the doubt for a few games. Don't think we see Mete next game, maybe at the end of next week if Eddy is still struggling.
It’s Kulak that I scratch for Mete. I think Mete speed and ability to transport the puck could fit well with Eddy. The most important change for me is switch Lehkonen and Armia. Armia clearly dosen’t fit with KK-Toffoli and I think he would bring an other dimension to the 4th line
He clearly does. That line was way more effective than Danault's line. Little more luck and Armia and Toffoli would have been both on scoresheet. Bashing on Armia has become ridiculous. But don't worry, he's gone in few months.Armia clearly dosen’t fit with KK-Toffoli and I think he would bring an other dimension to the 4th line
I don’t want him gone, He can be really useful with Byron and Evans on the 4th line and on special teams but he was lost with KK-Toffoli and that line had there best scoring chance when Lehkonen had a shift with themHe clearly does. That line was way more effective than Danault's line. Little more luck and Armia and Toffoli would have been both on scoresheet. Bashing on Armia has become ridiculous. But don't worry, he's gone in few months.
Rafael diaz wipes the floor with all of these corsis...In the process of adding quality of competition/quality of teammate, but... (Edmundson moved to RD based on Bergevin's comments at today's press conference).
View attachment 381818
Weal and Byron have really good numbers together, and Poehling has much better Corsi than Evans. So, I guess anything can happen with the fourth line. Perry is likely to play all non-back-to-back games I assume though. I have a feeling Poehling could win the Center spot if he's ready because he's now 210- but I left Evans because it's probably his to lose. Byron the best all-around but we don't have cap space for him to play?
That leaves LW open between Lehkonen and Frolik..?
Strictly by the numbers tho, our best fourth line would probably be Byron-Weal-Perry.
Rafael diaz wipes the floor with all of these corsis...
WIPES THE FLOOR!!
By game 10 I expect Romanov will be next to Petry, then up w Weber by game 40 as long as the wheels don’t fall off.
Edmundson will solidify the 3rd pairing
That sounds like a sarcastic joke. If Perry’s role is to be a supermassive offensive blackhole, then in that case he is fulfilling his role perfectly. Armia produced more in 11 minutes than Perry in seven games. Get real.It will be hard for Armia to get back in the lineup as Perry is clearly fufilling his role on the roster. His intangibles are also a noteworthy contribution which is not the case for Armia.
That sounds like a sarcastic joke. If Perry’s role is to be a supermassive offensive blackhole, then in that case he is fulfilling his role perfectly. Armia produced more in 11 minutes than Perry in seven games. Get real.
You know what to expect from Perry - he will deliver his game and experience constantly. And chip in a few from time to time at this point in his career. Armia can be quite enigmatic and doesn't own a particuliar role on the team. We have plenty of offense coming from all lines. Moving forward - and I greatly appreciated what Armia brought to the table last year - I don't see us retaining Armia with Poehling coming up gradually and a savvy vet in Perry who has the creds of a winner.
I don't know about your "real" but mine seems to have a larger horizon. Armia isn't in no means a bad player - just maybe not a fit with how the roster is blossoming into. I find the same for Byron and Drouin btw.
What about this:
Toffoli Stall Anderson
Drouin Kk Suzuki
Tatar Danault Gallagher
Lehkonen Glendening Armia
Trade: Evans for Glendening
TBH, I don't know much about Glendening outside of his faceoffs skills, I was just thinking of getting a Thompson type of center for the fourth line... Evans would still be fine though, but not ideal in that role...I would do your idea of having Staal in the top 9 (either he or Suzuki play wing).
But, I'd keep Evans as a 4th line winger because of his cost (700k), even if we bring in a veteran 4c. We'll need the 5M spent on Armia and Lehkonen next year to re-sign KK and Danault and Tatar, or their replacements.
I've heard Glendening is great on faceoffs but slow and not good at anything else.
I would do your idea of having Staal in the top 9 (either he or Suzuki play wing).
But, I'd keep Evans as a 4th line winger because of his cost (700k), even if we bring in a veteran 4c. We'll need the 5M spent on Armia and Lehkonen next year to re-sign KK and Danault and Tatar, or their replacements.
I've heard Glendening is great on faceoffs but slow and not good at anything else.