Good thing about internet message boards is that you can go back and see what people actually said. Should we just summarize for the fun of it? In chronological order:
On first goal:
On first goal:
On second goal:
Other comments:
Overall:
Me:
You did state that BOTH goals were dirty. So perhaps YOU should make sure what you actually wrote before accusing me of not reading everything properly.
Now all your smilies when you demand respect were unfortunately not copied, but that doesn't take anything away from that your passive aggressive style is laughable and that warrants one comment about refraining from calling this and that dirty.
So far in this thread you have called people: Horrible, dirty (like a hundred times), dicks, thuggish. On the same time you demand that people do not attack you personally, although no-one did. You are demanding that people do not put words in your mouth, although no-one did. You are demaning that people do not attack your opinion after you have insulted everyone in sight. These demands are seasoned with a lot of smilies as semiotic tools to aid your passive aggressive behaviour. Basically you insult everyone but when someone replies you say they shouldn't because it was only your opinion.
Then I and a few others were merely pointing out that the game was not dirty which you have stated a hundred times. At that point you had not taken those words back.
Then you go berserk and claim that you already said that it was a bad choise of word, even though you only said that AFTER I said that you shouldn't say it was dirty.
You also said:
And:
You never assulted anyone?? You merely wrote your opinion and then I smited at you? You were not rude when calling something else a dick? I on the other hand never made one personal comment. I don't know who you are, I don't care who you are, I only responded to what you actually said BEFORE you choose to change your language. Your comments throughout this thread has been an embarrasement to yourself and to the rest of us Danes, and that's why I choose to make the statement that the Czechs or their goals were not dirty. That was an answer to your (apparent) opinion. Not to you as a person.
We are not acting like forum police. We stated our opinion on a subject that you choose. On the other hand you said:
Then:
We are not entitled to an opinion? Or do you mean only about you? Well, no-one has launched a single personal attack on you. And I have most certainly not, so I don't know what choice of words you are talking about.
How about you take on of those chill pills?
By the way: My comment about that you maybe bit on the Eller bias was because you first stated that it was a good goal without realizing that maybe it was offside. Then Eller says it's a bad goal in the intermission report, and suddenly you are absolutely sure that it was bad everything about it was dirty.
PS: I know I also said the word dirty, but that was about a one year old hit made by Hansen in the SCF. Just to have that clarified before you jump on me.
I am not going to respond anymore if you choose to continue this argument. Now you know...
