In defense of bleed: I came back to watching this team after EStaal was traded in March 2016 and it was a totally different team in terms of the pace. It was *so* much more exciting to watch. I think the difference was the involvement of the defensemen in the O zone, and maybe some additional aggressiveness in the neutral zone. His system was fantastic.
In defense of Mrs Hank: you're a terrible coach if you can't get the players to play for something. Peters never got those teams to play for him because they didn't like him and never got them to play for each other because he didn't foster the environment. If you're going to be standoffish to the players, there has to be something that brings them together, and it's your job to make sure it exists.
By Brind'Amour's own assessment, his system is a minor tweak from Peters'...I can't say I noticed much of any difference. My belief is that Brind'Amour's biggest coaching accomplishment was to hold players accountable in a healthy way, show them trust by not flogging them when they made mistakes, and create the family atmosphere he loved under Laviolette. Those changes got the sum of parts to play greater than the individual pieces, something that Peters was never going to cook up.