RodTheBawd
Registered User
- Oct 16, 2013
- 5,529
- 8,604
Counter-argument (all hypothetically speaking, of course):
1. The wrist injury is something with more permanence and the Canes know this. Rather than watch him struggle for another year, they buy him out now.
2. The Canes have someone they want to target in FA and need the cap space to do so. After failing to find takers on Semin at 50% and no one making a good offer for Skinner, they buy Semin out.
3. The relationship between Semin and the coach has broken beyond repair, at which point the Canes would be foolish to keep him around for another year.
4. The Canes are struggling financially and can't afford to pay for a luxury item during a time where their roster needs to be as cost-friendly as possible. Staal and Ward are approaching new contracts (that will hopefully be lower), Skinner is still a marketable star, so that leaves Semin as the expensive oddman out.
Do any of those sound unreasonable, based on what we know?
#2 is the only one I can buy into.
And the comments about Eric using Semin's contract for leverage are pretty funny.