45 of Matthews 95 points directly involve Marner (either assisting on Marners goal or vise versa or both assisting on same goal) and 65 of his 95 points have come with Marner on the ice. Yet no one is calling Matthews a 50 point player without Marner. Weird
The original post said that Mcdavid and Draisaitl play on separate lines, therefore Mcdavid shouldn't have an impact on Draisaitl's totals.
Just p60, or if you think that McDavid (even though he’s on another line) counts for 50% of Drais points, while also ignoring Matthews linemates
Marner and Matthews play on the same line (65% of the time Matthews hits the ice, Marner is on the ice as well). If anything, you've shown how much Draisaitl benefits from his brief playing time with Mcdavid - Matthews and Marner share the ice 65% of the time, and yet Marner is only involved in 45 of Matthews points (47%!).
Draisaitl has only played ~41% (even strength and PP only) with Mcdavid but somehow Mcdavid has received a
direct contribution to 45% of his point totals. Draisaitl is getting a lopsided amount of his points with a player he barely plays 5 on 5 with.
Nobody is making a claim that Draisaitl is not an elite player, but the idea that he's creating a ton of offence without Mcdavid is false. He still benefits a ton playing with Mcdavid despite only playing 1/2 of his time with him.