You know, I dont buy into this "trade worked well for both teams" mantra, sorry. I dont really want to gloat and dont have need to do so, but it seems more and more as lopsided trade.
I mean, Liles is undersized D, below average defensively, with a bit of an edge in him and great rushing. His main asset is his offense and PP QB abilities. With that, Liles has only 2 points in 16 games, his only goal coming against his former team playing around 20:00 TOI..
This is, actually, exactly why he found himself in AHL and then was traded - offensive D that does not produce offensive numbers. He lost his spot to rocky and Ranger played ahead of him, which says a lot. Also with ok start after the trade he cooled down significantly and looks clueless again in D zone. I like Liles, but let's be realistic here.
On the other hand, Gleason was a rock back there and Tampa recently found about that hard way. Teams take notice, rest assured. We played soft-ish this year and Gleason was much needed infusion of muscles to D corps. Trade could not come at better time for us with leafs on massive losing stick and playing badly, blown-out few times and sliding in standings fast, outside of PO and with all teams above and around with games in hand!!!
Then these nice guys in Carolina decided to help us out and gifted us Gleason. Leafs turned on a dot and ascended, beating up pretty good teams on the way there. Gleason somewhat surprisingly stabilizes our D, skates great, pinches smart, clears crease, fights, blocks tons of shots and [hilariously] outscores Liles so far.
So, summarizing, we traded 4M of dead cap space for more that useful D, who helped team immediately and contributed in so many ways, while Liles is doing pretty much nothing for CAR. I call it highway robbery. There. I said it.