I honestly don't see the merits behind being pro Boucher. After last season I would have agreed with you fully. Boucher helped the team outperform in both the regular season and the playoffs and his success in his first season in Tampa was worth noting as well. There was merit behind his capabilities as a coach as he demonstrated his ability to attain success. But after this season I don't think there is an ability to look past his faults. Certainly there were conditions in both Tampa and Ottawa that influenced the results but there appears to be something more there than conditions that are purely circumstantial. I don't think you can look at his performance in Tampa and his performance in Ottawa and not derive some meaningful patterns. Boucher was the constant in both situations and the results are very similar. It certainly brings up a lot of questions as to why the results are so similar and what role Boucher played. The Senators looked horrible on all metrics this season and there were not enough changes to the roster or other conditions to explain away such a big swing in performance. The biggest issue is that Boucher received a vote of confidence in December and didn't make any improvements. He didn't change his tactics and didn't make necessary adjustments. Boucher was also fired from his team in the Swiss league, SC Bern, prior to returning to the NHL. The evidence suggests that he is a short lived coach. This article summarizes many of the conflicts that Tampa fans found
Why Guy Boucher Needed to Be Fired (And Why It Should Have Happened Sooner)
It seems like he has a system that he is really inflexible with. He lives and dies by his system and is unwilling to change it. His system appears to get him success but it doesn't appear to be sustainable. It is also really boring and even players around the league are critical of it
Hockey world reacts to Flyers, Lightning tactics
His system isn't even that new. In many ways it is basically just a copy of the neutral zone trap that the Devils used to play. It is also the most boring style that fans hate and players hate playing.
The '95 Devils, 20 Years Later: How a Team and Its Infamous Trap Changed the NHL
I don't see how the team performs better next year if Boucher was to stick around and why there should be confidence in him moving forward. If he somehow didn't get fired this offseason and sucked next year and then got fired would you still think he is a good coach and the Sens were making a mistake?
As for the Sutter and physicality comment, we should definitely want the team to be more physical. Physicality plays a huge role in the NHL and most importantly in the playoffs. The league isn't really trending away from physicality as it is trending to be more skilled. This is a misinterpretation of some fans, they think physicality is less useful in today's league but they just miss the point. It is as useful as it has ever been. Teams can't sacrifice skill and depth for pure physicality, but there is huge value in having skilled players that are also physical. The Bruins and the Blue Jackets are both gritty physical teams and their physical players are fairly skilled. Anaheim lost to San Jose which is also a big and physical team. Vegas also has skilled and physical players.
Sutter would be a good coach for the Sens because he is a proven cup winner and well respected across the league. The Sens need to have a coach that gets them motivated to compete hard night in night out. A coach that can get them playing with emotion and passion. Boucher takes the emotion out of the game and out of the players.
We disagree completely on Boucher and neither of us are going to change our minds, so I won't continue to clog up the forum with more back and forth over it. We've both made our points.
I think the people who want Sutter will be very disappointed if he ever comes here. He is the definition of an old school coach who wants to dump and chase and play a physical heavy game despite the league transitioning more and more to a possession game with speed and skill. He's known to be a grinding personality that demands maximum effort and burns out quickly with his rigid style. There were stories about the Kings players locking him out of the locker room after a game as a result of being so fed up with him - and that's after winning two Cups with lots of those players. For the people who want to see more offense and more creativity, you're not going to get that with Sutter. One reason he was fired was because the Kings offense was seen as archaic and he refused to play a more wide-open style. He's also extremely hard on young players and prefers his veterans.
These are all similar to the types of complaints we've seen regarding Boucher. Stubborn, burnout, too defensive oriented, too loyal to vets, refusal to adapt, etc.
The league is definitely less physical than it has ever been. Yeah the hitting and intensity gets cranked up in the playoffs, but it's nothing like it used to be. There are so many more penalties being called in the playoffs than there used to be. Blind side hits, head shots, and fighting are being legislated out. You can't get away with the Clutching, grabbing, slashing, or interfering that you used to be able to. You can barely touch guys standing in front of the net without being called for a penalty nowadays.
The two teams that exemplify a heavy physical game the most over the last few years are the Ducks and Kings. They were both just swept by teams with more speed and more skill. Vegas is a speed team. The Kings tried to run them through the boards and beat them up but could not possess the puck or score. Same thing with the Ducks vs the Sharks. The Kings and Ducks used to get their cycle game going and beat the bag out of you, wear you down with so much possession. Now they spend so much time chasing the faster teams that they struggle to maintain enough zone time to manufacture goals.
The Bruins have shifted away from a physical heavy defensive game under Cassidy. They've opened up the offense much more and injected more youth/skill into the lineup since moving on from Julien. Columbus is not really being carried by a big heavy bunch of guys either. For their best players, they have new age mobile defenseman like Werenski and Jones, and they've got smaller speedsters like Panarin and Atkinson really driving their offense. Guys like Dubinsky, Foligno, Jenner who have been seen as harder more physical/heavier two way types struggle to keep up and don't have the impact they once did. They've essentially become 30 point players in the regular season.
I mean, have you even really noticed a guy like Corey Perry or Wayne Simmonds this post season? They're borderline invisible. The effect they have on the game has been minimized greatly with all the speed and skill out there nowadays.
The one team that is still a heavy team having success is Winnipeg. They're gigantic up front and on the blue line, and they play a very physically intimidating game, but almost all of their big guys can skate. Laine Scheifele and Wheeler can fly. Guys like Myers and Trouba move pretty well for big guys.