Probably not popular....but Smith is not helping
3rd pair + 4th line again. Sigh.
I have felt that way as well. The biggest indicator is when the team loses the puck on the cycle and it's trickling to the wall as a loose puck. Pretty much every team has their D pinch to keep it alive, we have our D back off. I believe Gulutzan referred to this as "50/50 Hockey" where if you don't have a 70%+ chance of getting to the puck, you don't take the risk.
Hamonic was never worth the price. An absolutely terrible trade by Treliving.From what I've seen so far, Hamonic is not worth the price we paid.
The definition doesn't really mean much if all they have done is turn it into a guy who's team most overachieved.
How is it that Babcock, Sutter and Quenville have 1 win between them (when Q was in St. L) and yet Bylsma, Hartley, Roy and MacLean each have one in the last 10 years.
Is there a single list of top 5 coaches over the past 10 years that doesn't have at least 1, if not all 3, of those guys listed on it? Is there a single list of the top 20 coaches of the past 10 years that has any of the 4 guys who won listed?
From what I've seen so far, Hamonic is not worth the price we paid.
Hamonic was never worth the price. An absolutely terrible trade by Treliving.
From what I've seen so far, Hamonic is not worth the price we paid.
I wonder if they start Rittich in Toronto on Wednesday just so Smith gets an extra day of rest.