Sgt Schultz
Registered User
The bolded highlights the inherent problem. The Blues wouldn't be in a position where one or two of the areas you propose would have to work. If the Blues strip it down, everything, and more, would have to go right in order to be competitive in 5 years.
Look at teams like Minnesota. That team had a "successful" rebuild that got them into the playoffs consistently thank to good drafts and good player acquisitions. They haven't found much playoff success because the players they acquired weren't good enough despite being good players. A team like the Flames are dangerously close to re-evaluating their situation despite finding consistent regular season success and developing solid NHL players. They tried for a shorter-term rebuild and now they might have to throwout a lot of what they've built (if the Gaudreau rumors are to be believed) because what they built hasn't been successful against the league. You can even use the Blues prior to 2017. A good team every year that only made it out of the 2nd round once during that timeframe. And immediately after it happened, they had to retool.
Rebuilds are always an inevitability for a team. The Blues will have to go through another one sometime in the future. But they are a last resort for a reason. The goal of all rebuilds is to be in the position the Blues are currently in. No, they are not vastly superior to every other team in the league. They are not a team that can steamroll every other team in their path while not breaking a sweat. But that's a level of near perfection that's arguably been achieved a handful of times in the last 30 years. The Blues will have to work their asses off to win another title. But so will the team that wishes to beat the Blues.
The steamroller level of success has not been achieved during the salary cap era. The Pens have been the only back to back winners in the salary cap era, with the Kings winning two years out of three. But neither of those teams were in a class above everybody else.
We will probably never see dominance like the mid to late 70's Canadiens, early 80's Islanders, or mid to late 80's Oiler's again.
I don't think it is possible to achieve that level of success for more than a season or two, and that is if some very young players pay big dividends early in their careers.
I don't think it is possible to achieve that level of success for more than a season or two, and that is if some very young players pay big dividends early in their careers.
The salary cap pretty much precludes building a dynasty. The best you can do is build a consistent playoff team and keep enough young talent rolling in to gradually turn over the roster. Even that is a very tall order.
Last edited: