My concern isn't that we signed a depth defensemen.
My concern is that we aleady had 3 depth defensemen by my count.
we didn't nee dnaother guy under stu and clitsome, we needed one above. Signing one below signals to me that we aren't pursuing anything above.
Beyond that...if we're going to signa depth d man...why resign the one that played for the 6th worst team int he league? We couldn't have taken a chance on someone else who might not be as bad as we know they are?
As others have said, for a team that needs "the irght d core" to evaluate their goal tender, they certainly don't seem ot be making a single ****ing effort.
our D improvement literally hinges entirely on the development of or young players. That is just ****ing stupid no matter how you slice it.
this deal isn't bad, and isn't big issue, and blah blah blah. Like so many of chevies moves, in a vaccuume it's fine- in the current context, it's less then fine.
