Burrowsaurus
Registered User
- Mar 20, 2013
- 42,486
- 16,101
LOL.
More like Gretzky lite lite lite lite lite lite lite lite lite lite lite lite lite lite.
Doesn't put a single dent into my comparison.
LOL.
More like Gretzky lite lite lite lite lite lite lite lite lite lite lite lite lite lite.
He plays PP point (PPP) for bingo. Used to also play the Triple P for Ohio state.
Maybe a Hoffman lite? With a centers awareness? Gretzky lite?
He plays PP point (PPP) for bingo. Used to also play the Triple P for Ohio state.
Maybe a Hoffman lite? With a centers awareness?
Gretzky-liteMore like a light Kyle Wellwood-lite, with more grit and less defensive ability.
P.S. I removed part of your post because seeing it printed once is enough.
5:25 ice time, and I don't remember him getting any shifts after his penalty.
How do we expect our prospects to become NHL players when we give them **** all of a chance?
New players shouldn't be given the shortest leash, that should go to players who have consistently shown poor play.
5:25 ice time, and I don't remember him getting any shifts after his penalty.
How do we expect our prospects to become NHL players when we give them **** all of a chance?
New players shouldn't be given the shortest leash, that should go to players who have consistently shown poor play.
One of the things I loved about MacLean is he would play the young guys when they get called up.
Doesn't put a single dent into my comparison.
I listened to an interview once with Methy on Tsn1200 and he said Mac was more old school and wanted things done a certain way. He said that as long as they played within the system he would be ok with you and hated it when you took chances or did things outside of the system. While DC promoted some of those risks.
I am just done with DC. I didn't like him last year either but how could anyone argue with his success.
I am not delusional however. The real issue is the leadership group of this team. They just don't seem to care about being the most abysmal team defensively and winning puck battles. It started after Alfie left and Spezza took over, Karlsson and his lazy starts doesn't help either.
Should have picked a better captain.
I listened to an interview once with Methy on Tsn1200 and he said Mac was more old school and wanted things done a certain way. He said that as long as they played within the system he would be ok with you and hated it when you took chances or did things outside of the system. While DC promoted some of those risks.
I am just done with DC. I didn't like him last year either but how could anyone argue with his success.
I am not delusional however. The real issue is the leadership group of this team. They just don't seem to care about being the most abysmal team defensively and winning puck battles. It started after Alfie left and Spezza took over, Karlsson and his lazy starts doesn't help either.
Should have picked a better captain.
This isn't about Karlsson, IMO.
I mean, Karlsson might not have been my first choice for Captain, but this isn't his fault either.
Hahaha man the whole karlsson doesn't care angle might be one of the worst opinions in the entire NHL.
He's puts up elite 1C numbers while also keeping opposition scoring chances to a minimum. And he does this all by not caring? I ain't even mad, I'm impressed.
Cameron is garbage though. Last year his system was fast paced balls to the wall. Which is understandable since we simply could not lose. And I get we can't play like that for 82 games but man, keep some sort of shred from what made you successful.
I guess I should clarify. It isn't his fault but he contributes to it as he is in the leadership group.
Karlsson
Turris
Methot
Neil
Smith
Ryan
But... all of those guys have exceeded expectations this year.
I don't understand the accusation here.
And sent back down.
I feel that these people are setting the tone for the acceptance of lackluster defensive play and the loss of puck battles.
They may be doing much better offensively than thought but they are weak on battles and there just seems to be a general shoulder shrug approach to playing defence.
When your support players follow suit you have a team that as a whole doesn't do the little things and results in being stuck in your own zone for a great deal of time.
Re-watch the game if you want and take a look at what the "veterans" and leaders of this team do when on the ice. All offence but no where near the same commitment on D.