GM's do occasionally use them...just rarely.
Rarely b/c an offer sheet is like a check move in chess...it's a challenge to the opposing GM's cap management so: 1. it won't be well received; 2. the opposing GM or one of his buddies may seek some payback later so you will need to have all of your own pieces covered. The offering GM also may be looking for a new job in a few years and, if he's made a few folks mad, that new job may be hard to find (in the NHL world of recycled GM's and recycled coaches). It's part old boys club, part chess and part anti-trust.
But tanking and having 8 top10 picks, 4 of which are 1st overall, in consecutive drafts should be well received? I feel this needs to be curbed and it's in the GMs hands. If GMs start offer sheeting these young stars, the dynamics of how this sport deals with young talent will be tipped on it's head.
I understand all the ramifications of this, but GMs can sign players sooner then July if they are worried.
1st: Draisaitl has to sign it
2nd: Draisaitl loves it in edmonton and is really close with McDavid and co. Saying that, I am positive he will get a fair deal from Chia, not sign an offersheet and be apart of something special here in Edmonton.
Sorry to say, I don't care about your insecurities. Maybe you are right, he loves it in Edmonton, he... but if offered 9.4M at the age of 21 for 5 years... I think it would be very difficult to walk away.
I'm not debating Draisaitl in particular, and I understand the ridiculousness of this statement in a Draisaitl discussion... I just want to know if other fans around the league think the NHL has a problem with teams finding ways to being a Stanley Cup Champion by sucking for a decade or more. This is by no means an exact science, but why should the 29/30 teams let them get away with it?