Let me guess with Columbus luck....
Columbus chooses Smith, he'll be decent but Carlsson will be a stud.
Columbus chooses Carlsson, it'll be Smith who is a stud lol
Let me guess with Columbus luck....
Columbus chooses Smith, he'll be decent but Carlsson will be a stud.
Columbus chooses Carlsson, it'll be Smith who is a stud lol
That could take any meaning depending on how fleeced you felt.Best comment was from a heartbroken Anaheim fan:
I just fell to my knees in an In N Out.
Admittedly Weekes is just a scapegoat. The only thing he did wrong was leak it early because apparently there was a production error.Also, why are people making a big deal about the Weekes thing?? All he really did, was say what he did sooner than he was supposed to, right?? How do you think he had all those team related draft picks statistics ready to go??
The reason the CBJ were “set” to pick at #3, was literally in the rules after SJ went to #4, correct?? Weekes just didn’t give people watching the time to come to terms/realize it yet, no??
That said, what ever happened to the ping pong balls?? What is the explanation they give to not hold the actual lottery, the picking of the balls ‘live’??
Don't be absurd.Although we didn't win the #1 pick, we could still trade for it.
That’s right, Bus. After all Weekes is ESPN’s hockey version of Adam Schefter so he was just trying to scoop everyone, forgetting he scooped his own network.Also, why are people making a big deal about the Weekes thing?? All he really did, was say what he did sooner than he was supposed to, right?? How do you think he had all those team related draft picks statistics ready to go??
The reason the CBJ were “set” to pick at #3, was literally in the rules after SJ went to #4, correct?? Weekes just didn’t give people watching the time to come to terms/realize it yet, no??
That said, what ever happened to the ping pong balls?? What is the explanation they give to not hold the actual lottery, the picking of the balls ‘live’??
Only if Barry Trotz becomes the GMAlthough we didn't win the #1 pick, we could still trade for it.
Weekes has nothing to do with it. The question is why the third Chicago could have won. It doesn't make me angry that we lost. Happens yes and that kind of talent doesn't mean success will come, at least quickly, especially considering the payroll Colorado barely made it, Toronto... well you see for yourself, the Oilers took a long time too, long nothing, we'll see how this season goes. On the contrary Tampa won the SC twice, even though the first number of the draft Stamkos was no longer in prime age, actually plays as a mid first round player. On the contrary, Hedman, McDonaugh, Kucherov, Point and the Goodrow -- Gourde -- Coleman were great. Of course, Vasilevskiy was also a monster.Also, why are people making a big deal about the Weekes thing?? All he really did, was say what he did sooner than he was supposed to, right?? How do you think he had all those team related draft picks statistics ready to go??
The reason the CBJ were “set” to pick at #3, was literally in the rules after SJ went to #4, correct?? Weekes just didn’t give people watching the time to come to terms/realize it yet, no??
That said, what ever happened to the ping pong balls?? What is the explanation they give to not hold the actual lottery, the picking of the balls ‘live’??
Admittedly Weekes is just a scapegoat. The only thing he did wrong was leak it early because apparently there was a production error.
No it was not in the rules. The jackets could have picked anywhere from 1-4. Obviously when San Jose was at 4, that number was eliminated, and our odds to pick 3rd went higher (as did our odds to pick 1-2).
The ping pong ball reveal is usually released in a video sometime later.
Whats Dvorsky's upside? 1C but not as likely as others to reach it? More of a 2C guy on a good team?
Here’s the ping pong balls
Dvorsky has improved his skating and continues to work on it, so you don't have to worry about that if Jarmo picks him. Which I give minimal chance to.Thankfully we won't have to draft Dvorsky, I'm not as high on him. Though his placement on Bob's list tells you that NHL scouts are high on him, some had him in the top 4. Grant McCagg has him at #3.
If he becomes a #1C it will be in the O'Reilly vein. He's a technically clean but slow skater, lacking athleticism. Very good defensively and very good hands for finishing, great shot. But I personally hate to pick a guy like that high, anything less than perfect processing at the NHL level and he'll be stuck as a 3C.
@majormajor Did you have Carlsson at #2 on your board? I could use some uplifting analysis of why Carlsson is better than Fantilli