You're right. I guess he'll either be with Brynas or back in the Superelit.
I think that sometimes people make too big of a deal over exposure. I'm not saying thats what you are doing, but I've seen some recently suggest he's now gotta move to the CHL to get himself more media exposure.
Boqvist probably won't play that many games the rest of the season for Brynas, he'll probably dominate in Superelit the rest of the season, and do so at the WJC-18. I think he'll still be a very high pick, almost certainly top 5, maybe as high as 2.
I think he should stay with Brynas and try to earn his role. I think he could play a role now with them, but they don't want to give him that opportunity right now, and thats their right to think that way. On other teams, he might already have a regular role. Some have said he needs to go midseason to the London Knights because of this, but I completely disagree. That will make his development path at a young age much tougher just to have some extra exposure to the draft media. Unless you are some complete no name, thats a dumb strategy. I was making the same point about Kupari recently. These guys should stick it out at teams that developed their skills well to begin with. They don't need to be the most exposed players in the draft to be drafted high. It doesn't even matter if they are drafted 3, 8, 13, 20. It matters how well they develop as NHL prospects.
I think this is a big problem with some draft prospects. They leave a good development situation just because of a few bad months with one team or not getting as much playing time as they want for a few months. For most of these players, this is a long game. Their development from the time being drafted to the NHL is many years, I think thats gotta be considered. Did it end up helping Tambellini to move to the CHL and score a million points when he wasn't doing well in the NCAA's? How would've it worked out for Shestyorkin if he came over to NA when he wasn't getting playing time in the KHL?