Navin R Slavin
Fifth line center
He may not be a "franchise guy" but I don't see us being able to replace what he brings anytime soon.
We'd replace him by committee.
He may not be a "franchise guy" but I don't see us being able to replace what he brings anytime soon.
The question Dougie needs to ask himself, IMO, is can he handle the Press pressure he will be getting is such a larger market?
Boston was a bust,
Calgary better but didn't associate with teammates supposedly
Carolina relaxed and prospered teammates liked him.
I understand he is older and more mature but the question still remains will he be as successful if he moves to a market where he is going to be hounded day in and day out by the Press.
To me if not Carolina, Dougie would be better off going someplace like Nashville, Dallas, maybe Colorado or Seattle, where he won't constantly be hounded by the Press, just my opinion.
I think all this is probably bunk, tbh.
If he stays, it's probably because he wants to stay, and the offer satisfies his ego.
If he leaves, it's probably because he believes he's worth more and wants to feel valued, which also satisfies his ego.
Either way, the money will be astronomical. Some folks keep score with money, and if he is one of those people, the highest score will be somewhere else.
I agree it will probably be about the money, That is why I stated in my opinion I think he should consider.
However, I believe that in a lot of athletes going for Free Agency and they take the money, Some succeed and some fail after they land that big contract. I see Dougie as having a potential of being on the failing end if he goes someplace where he will be constantly under the presses eyes.
I for one hope he stays, and if he goes I wish him luck, but if he goes to NJ, or another high profile team where the Press will constantly be on him, it will not surprise me to see him traded in 5 to 5 years with his team eating a big portion of the contract.
So would Dougie be considered "the big splash" at the price points discussed above?
The problem is that Donnie says pretty much the same about Fox. "Yeah, I feel good about this, everything would be fine".I have a feeling this might be the setup for;
“we like Dougie and gave him a fair offer, but we needed an answer now so we could plan for free agency. Ultimately, he wants more than we are offering so we have to move on.
I guess it depends on how much cap space they need this season. They free up more by buying him out than burying him.Stupid question - if you buy him out, why not just bury him? Whats the diff? If you can't get anything for the asset, can you just waive him and see if someone takes that horrid contract? If not you use the 22m expansion fees to pay his stupid salary.
I'd MUCH rather have Deangelo than Gardiner. Dougie to gards is a massive slap in the face.
You save 2.8 million in space with a buyout only 1.125 with a bury in the minors.Stupid question - if you buy him out, why not just bury him? Whats the diff? If you can't get anything for the asset, can you just waive him and see if someone takes that horrid contract? If not you use the 22m expansion fees to pay his stupid salary.
I'd MUCH rather have Deangelo than Gardiner. Dougie to gards is a massive slap in the face.
I agree it will probably be about the money, That is why I stated in my opinion I think he should consider.
However, I believe that in a lot of athletes going for Free Agency and they take the money, Some succeed and some fail after they land that big contract. I see Dougie as having a potential of being on the failing end if he goes someplace where he will be constantly under the presses eyes.
I for one hope he stays, and if he goes I wish him luck, but if he goes to NJ, or another high profile team where the Press will constantly be on him, it will not surprise me to see him traded in 3 to 5 years with his team eating a big portion of the contract.
Cap hit on buried $2,975,000 X 2 years = 5,950,000Stupid question - if you buy him out, why not just bury him? Whats the diff? If you can't get anything for the asset, can you just waive him and see if someone takes that horrid contract? If not you use the 22m expansion fees to pay his stupid salary.
I'd MUCH rather have Deangelo than Gardiner. Dougie to gards is a massive slap in the face.
I agree. Also, think it's a big mistake to overpromise and put hope out there so soon after after the Ned situation if he knows a deal isn't getting done. A more measured and restrained approach might have been the way to go given the state of the fanbase right now.I have a feeling this might be the setup for;
“we like Dougie and gave him a fair offer, but we needed an answer now so we could plan for free agency. Ultimately, he wants more than we are offering so we have to move on.
If Dougie Doesn't sign they keep Gardiner on the roster, hoping he can play and be the point man on the PP. That is why they need Dougie to give them an answer within the next 48 hours.
Seems like a thinly veiled attempt to squeeze a 4th/5th round pick from the devil's to me.
I hope I eat crow... because I really want Dougie back, but I'm getting sick of the BS Don and the FO feeds the media.
All of this hardball negotiation is going to backfire really quickly.
We'd replace him by committee.