Is Jacques Martin available? He will shore up that D.
shut your trap...
I agree with aragorn and others that there is a country club atmosphere, but that starts at the top. When you have a GM that treats people like friends and family, sets expectations extremely low and caters to them by firing coaches like Liz Taylor went through husbands, then the players won't be afraid of slacking or taking liberties with the coaching staff.
There needs to be an experienced coach down the line but there most of all needs ot be an external hire at the GM position that doesn't coddle them, whom will hire a new coach that will hold everyone accountable. I hate giving credit to the Leafs but Babcock was a great hire for them. It's business, the business is winning, play our plan and sit. This is stuff that would be needed here, the players would buy in and the fans would buy in. And it doesn't count on the cap so...
We need good players on defense, not a coach. A coach plays what he's given and right now whoever plays on defense is just not good enough.
This is why Murray has to go. He keeps hiring the wrong coach for the wrong type of team. This hire was all Melnyk but still seeing what Randy Carlyle did with a crappy Toronto roster makes you think Murry's ego is the problem. Doesn't want a veteran coach chirping in the bosses ear like he did under Muckler.
if his only hire was Cameron then you would be right.Having an argument with your self I see.
Also don't want to be known as a coaches graveyard... doesn't help with future recruitment...
I sure we won't be paying any more coaches not too coach for a while, besides DC has a good record since he has been coach.
Is a veteran coach inhearently better?
Should we get Carlysle? Mike Keenan? Guy Boucher?
It's painfully evident that the roster isn't more than a bubble team. So why are we looking to change the coach?
Fix the D, then see if a coaching change is neccesary. Until then, you're just spinning tires by continuing the coaching carousel.
While the D definitely needs at least one upgrade, the problem defensively isn't solely the D.
Cameron spoke to this yesterday when he said (paraphrasing), the forwards just don't seem to be interested in playing in the D-Zone.
Cameron said this after watching a rerun of the Montreal game, something I've been saying this since the start of the season.
The comedy act that has become the Sens defensive zone play is on Cameron and his staff, IMO.
The Boro forward experiment and Prince sitting is on Cameron & staff.
It is incomprehensible that Prince, the player that made the 4th line somewhat useful, sits while Boro does nothing but occupy space on that line.
The Boro for Prince move and the move of Smith to the second line has made the Sens a 3 line team, with the 3rd line looking much like a 4th line with Dizzy and Chaisson on the wings (no criticism of these two).
IMO the mess is on Cameron & staff, specially since Murray said it is Cameron's decision who plays or if a call up is needed, he doesn't believe in interfering.
if his only hire was Cameron then you would be right.
I think I explained myself fine.