I'm going to assume you don't really follow football(soccer) if that is what you are basing this on.Holland is a dark horse? Undefeated in qualifying and defending runner-ups. What?First of all these are not my dark horses, someone else brought those 3 teams up. I was simply making fun of the Fifa rankings.
But I would say without a doubt none of those 3 teams are likely to win this tournament IMO. And if indeed England are the 6th best odds to win the tournament anyone putting money on them is a complete fool as you deserve WAY better odds than that. If I had to pick one of those 3 teams it would have to be Uruguay since this tournament is in South America but with the major questions about Suarez's knee I don't like their chances either at this point.
Honestly anyone outside of the big 4 of Spain, Germany, Brazil, and Argentina going into this tournament is a dark horse. I guess it is hard to say a traditional power like Italy is a dark horse as they definitely have enough quality if Balotelli doesn't flake out so ok not them. So yeah 27 dark horses...
The Dutch have no chance whatsoever. They are in a tough group to begin with. They lost their workhorse in midfield a few months ago when Strootman tore his ACL playing for Roma. The guy who was going to replace him, who was in no way the same type of player and was already going to be a serious step down, van der Vaart, just dropped out with a calf injury. And their defense is made up of guys who either haven't moved out of the Dutch league, which is a decent league but is definitely 2nd tier, or play for lower tier teams in bigger leagues and not too well mind you. Even the guy who pulls the strings in midfield, Sneijder, is a far cry from the player he was 4 years ago having to play in Turkey for the last few seasons.
They have a couple of world class forwards and that is pretty much about it. The Dutch had a cake qualifying group. They will be lucky to get out of their 1st round group in Brazil.
And I'm a huge fan of the Oranje but that is a team in transition that even if Robben and van Persie are fantastic has no hope.
QD, who do you think advances?
Germany and Ghana.
Playing yesterday in Manaus has the triple effect of one day fewer rest, a much harder recovery due to the conditions, and a much longer flight to Thursday's game for both Portugal and the US.
No outcome would surprise me, though, due to the possibility of a runaway scoreline either way in the Ghana/Portugal game, since they both need outright wins, so whoever trails will have to open it up to try to get back in it.
Quoting again for posterity.
Quoting again for posterity.
How about them Mexicans.
One last note on the US-Portugal game. I see that Micheal Bradley is getting a lot of heat for his poor decision making at the end of the game, and rightly so. But I think the goat of the game has to be Geoff Cameron and his mindlessly stupid clearance to give Portugal the early 1-0 lead. That kind of error was utterly bush league. I mean, if you were draw up a "work description" of a "professional soccer player: defenceman", one of his primary duties would include "clearing the ball cleanly out of the defensive zone." A far greater error than Bradley's clumsiness, which didn't directly to a goal.
I will say it again, there is no chance the Oranje win the World Cup this year. And when they get knocked out I'll be a big enough man not to remind you of it.
How about them Mexicans.
Exactly. I have played soccer for over 15 years now and most of the time was spent as a center back in a flat four. As a center back you have to take demand of the team and be able to communicate, pick up marks, provide assistance to your outside backs, and win the ball when it comes around you. Cameron did not do most of these things during the game.
The first goal was simple clearance that boils down to a lack of focus. The whole team came out flat, but that mistake probably cost them the game. The final goal resulted because of Bradley's turnover, but it's foolish to blame him. To a casual or amateur soccer fan, Bradley is at fault. Look closer at that play and you clearly see Cameron with his head up his ass as he tracks back to the goal. He doesn't pick up his man, gets beat to the ball, and Portugal gets the equalizer. All he had to do was pick his head up and get some sort of contact with the player to knock him off balance, or try to win the header. Instead he is late to the party and the US could be denied entering the knockout stage.
One last note on the US-Portugal game. I see that Micheal Bradley is getting a lot of heat for his poor decision making at the end of the game, and rightly so. But I think the goat of the game has to be Geoff Cameron and his mindlessly stupid clearance to give Portugal the early 1-0 lead. That kind of error was utterly bush league. I mean, if you were draw up a "work description" of a "professional soccer player: defenceman", one of his primary duties would include "clearing the ball cleanly out of the defensive zone." A far greater error than Bradley's clumsiness, which didn't directly to a goal.
Exactly. I have played soccer for over 15 years now and most of the time was spent as a center back in a flat four. As a center back you have to take demand of the team and be able to communicate, pick up marks, provide assistance to your outside backs, and win the ball when it comes around you. Cameron did not do most of these things during the game.
The first goal was simple clearance that boils down to a lack of focus. The whole team came out flat, but that mistake probably cost them the game. The final goal resulted because of Bradley's turnover, but it's foolish to blame him. To a casual or amateur soccer fan, Bradley is at fault. Look closer at that play and you clearly see Cameron with his head up his ass as he tracks back to the goal. He doesn't pick up his man, gets beat to the ball, and Portugal gets the equalizer. All he had to do was pick his head up and get some sort of contact with the player to knock him off balance, or try to win the header. Instead he is late to the party and the US could be denied entering the knockout stage.
Exactly. I have played soccer for over 15 years now and most of the time was spent as a center back in a flat four. As a center back you have to take demand of the team and be able to communicate, pick up marks, provide assistance to your outside backs, and win the ball when it comes around you. Cameron did not do most of these things during the game.
The first goal was simple clearance that boils down to a lack of focus. The whole team came out flat, but that mistake probably cost them the game. The final goal resulted because of Bradley's turnover, but it's foolish to blame him. To a casual or amateur soccer fan, Bradley is at fault. Look closer at that play and you clearly see Cameron with his head up his ass as he tracks back to the goal. He doesn't pick up his man, gets beat to the ball, and Portugal gets the equalizer. All he had to do was pick his head up and get some sort of contact with the player to knock him off balance, or try to win the header. Instead he is late to the party and the US could be denied entering the knockout stage.
Dude, no. The apology tour for Bradley needs to stop already. He's been atrocious these two games. Your quarterback in the midfield and the best player on the team absolutely cannot give the ball away when he had time and space to settle and distribute. Hell, just boot the ball into the stands and we win the game. If you've played soccer for 15 years, you'd know that the last thing you can do to a dangerous counter attacking team is to turn the ball over in the middle third, which is what Bradley did. Cameron was caught out of position and had a poor game, but he's not even in that position if Bradley makes a play that a middle schooler could make. The defense were unsettled and poorly tracked Portugal's runners, but c'mon, that play is mostly on Bradley. You know what other mistake probably cost us the game? Bradley missing the net without a goalie in it.